Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:20
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Vancomycin presoak reduces infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Mingwei Hu ;
Yifan Zhang ;
Guangqian Shang ;
Jianjun Guo ;
Hao Xu ;
Xue Ma ;
Xue Yang ;
Shuai Xiang .
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
[42]   What is the impact of Kinesio taping on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Elrosasy, Amr ;
Abo Zeid, Mohamed ;
Abbas, Ahmed W. ;
Eldeeb, Hatem ;
Eljadid, Ghaith Y. ;
Hamid, Abdulrahman Khaldoon ;
Al Azzawi, Mohammad Al Diab .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (04) :2213-2222
[43]   Early or delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is one superior? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ferguson, D. ;
Palmer, A. ;
Khan, S. ;
Oduoza, U. ;
Atkinson, H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) :1277-1289
[44]   Effectiveness of psychological intervention following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Isaji, Yuichi ;
Uchino, Shota ;
Inada, Ryuta ;
Saito, Hiroki .
PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2024, 69 :40-50
[45]   Clinical Results of Primary Repair Versus Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Trials [J].
Kunze, Kyle N. ;
Pareek, Ayoosh ;
Nwachukwu, Benedict U. ;
Ranawat, Anil S. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. ;
Kelly, Bryan T. ;
Allen, Answorth A. ;
Williams III, Riley J. .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (06)
[46]   Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Kong, Lingde ;
Liu, Zhao ;
Meng, Fei ;
Shen, Yong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (01) :1-15
[47]   Patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yao L.-W. ;
Wang Q. ;
Zhang L. ;
Zhang C. ;
Zhang B. ;
Zhang Y.-J. ;
Feng S.-Q. .
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (2) :355-365
[48]   DELAYED VERSUS ACCELERATED WEIGHT-BEARING REHABILITATION PROTOCOL FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS [J].
Fan, Zheyuan ;
Yan, Jingtong ;
Zhou, Zhongsheng ;
Gao, Yu ;
Tang, Jinshuo ;
Li, Yuhuan ;
Zhang, Zhuo ;
Yang, Modi ;
Lv, Jiayin .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2022, 54
[49]   Quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon graft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials [J].
Raj, Siddarth ;
Ridha, Ali ;
Searle, Henry K. C. ;
Khatri, Chetan ;
Ahmed, Imran ;
Metcalfe, Andrew ;
Smith, Nicholas .
KNEE, 2024, 49 :226-240
[50]   Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without tourniquet use: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes [J].
Samei, Mahdieh ;
Daliri, Mahla ;
Sadeghi, Masoumeh ;
Ganji, Reza ;
Parsa, Ali ;
Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad H. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)