Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:20
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Over 90 % of children and adolescents return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Kay, Jeffrey ;
Memon, Muzammil ;
Marx, Robert G. ;
Peterson, Devin ;
Simunovic, Nicole ;
Ayeni, Olufemi R. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (04) :1019-1036
[32]   Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ho Jong Ra ;
Jun-Ho Kim ;
Dae-Hee Lee .
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 :923-931
[33]   Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Pang, Long ;
Li, Pengcheng ;
Li, Tao ;
Li, Yinghao ;
Zhu, Jing ;
Tang, Xin .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
[34]   Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis [J].
Kan, Shun-Li ;
Yuan, Zhi-Fang ;
Ning, Guang-Zhi ;
Yang, Bo ;
Li, Hai-Liang ;
Sun, Jing-Cheng ;
Feng, Shi-Qing .
MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (38)
[35]   Vancomycin presoak reduces infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Hu, Mingwei ;
Zhang, Yifan ;
Shang, Guangqian ;
Guo, Jianjun ;
Xu, Hao ;
Ma, Xue ;
Yang, Xue ;
Xiang, Shuai .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
[36]   Graft salvage following infected anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS [J].
Kursumovic, K. ;
Charalambous, C. P. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (05) :608-615
[37]   Remnant-preserving techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Chunrong ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Bei, Chaoyong ;
Xin, Linwei .
BMC SURGERY, 2025, 25 (01)
[38]   The efficacy of platelet rich plasma on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lv, Zheng-Tao ;
Zhang, Jin-Ming ;
Pang, Zhi-Ying ;
Wang, Zhe ;
Huang, Jun-Ming ;
Zhu, Wen-Tao .
PLATELETS, 2022, 33 (02) :229-241
[39]   The effects of proprioceptive training on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ma, Jiang ;
Zhang, Di ;
Zhao, Tianyu ;
Liu, Xiaoxiao ;
Wang, Ju ;
Zheng, Hui ;
Jin, Song .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (04) :506-521
[40]   What is the impact of Kinesio taping on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Amr Elrosasy ;
Mohamed Abo Zeid ;
Ahmed W. Abbas ;
Hatem Eldeeb ;
Ghaith Y. Eljadid ;
Abdulrahman Khaldoon Hamid ;
Mohammad Al diab Al azzawi .
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2024, 34 :2213-2222