Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:20
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   PRP does not improve the objective outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
André Luís Lugnani de Andrade ;
Amanda Veiga Sardeli ;
Thiago Alves Garcia ;
Bruno Livani ;
William Dias Belangero .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, 29 :3049-3058
[22]   PRP does not improve the objective outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
de Andrade, Andre Luis Lugnani ;
Sardeli, Amanda Veiga ;
Garcia, Thiago Alves ;
Livani, Bruno ;
Belangero, William Dias .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2021, 29 (09) :3049-3058
[23]   Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Females Using Patellar-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Tan, Si Heng Sharon ;
Lau, Bernard Puang Huh ;
Krishna, Lingaraj .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08) :770-787
[24]   Autograft Demonstrates Superior Outcomes for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction When Compared With Allograft: A Systematic Review [J].
Belk, John W. ;
Littlefield, Connor P. ;
Smith, John-Rudolph H. ;
McCulloch, Patrick C. ;
McCarty, Eric C. ;
Frank, Rachel M. ;
Kraeutler, Matthew J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (03) :859-867
[25]   Outcomes of Repeat Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction [J].
Griffith, Timothy B. ;
Allen, Benjamin J. ;
Levy, Bruce A. ;
Stuart, Michael J. ;
Dahm, Diane L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (06) :1296-1301
[26]   Effects of remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Xie, Huanyu ;
Fu, Zicai ;
Zhong, Mingjin ;
Deng, Zhenhan ;
Wang, Chen ;
Sun, Yijia ;
Zhu, Weimin .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
[27]   Meta-analysis comparing bioabsorbable versus metal interference screw for adverse and clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Laupattarakasem, Pat ;
Laopaiboon, Malinee ;
Kosuwon, Weerachai ;
Laupattarakasem, Wiroon .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (01) :142-153
[28]   Irradiated allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective studies [J].
Wang, Hong-De ;
Zhu, Yan-Bin ;
Wang, Tian-Rui ;
Zhang, Wei-Fei ;
Zhang, Ying-Ze .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 49 :45-55
[29]   Use of electromyographic biofeedback in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ananias, Joaquin ;
Vidal, Catalina ;
Ortiz-Munoz, Luis ;
Irarrazaval, Sebastian ;
Besa, Pablo .
PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2024, 123 :19-29
[30]   Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ra, Ho Jong ;
Kim, Jun-Ho ;
Lee, Dae-Hee .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (07) :923-931