Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:19
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Kim, Du-Han
    Bae, Ki-Cheor
    Kim, Dong-Wan
    Choi, Byung-Chan
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 31 (01)
  • [22] PRP does not improve the objective outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Andrade, Andre Luis Lugnani
    Sardeli, Amanda Veiga
    Garcia, Thiago Alves
    Livani, Bruno
    Belangero, William Dias
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2021, 29 (09) : 3049 - 3058
  • [23] Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Females Using Patellar-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Si Heng Sharon
    Lau, Bernard Puang Huh
    Krishna, Lingaraj
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08) : 770 - 787
  • [24] Autograft Demonstrates Superior Outcomes for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction When Compared With Allograft: A Systematic Review
    Belk, John W.
    Littlefield, Connor P.
    Smith, John-Rudolph H.
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (03) : 859 - 867
  • [25] Outcomes of Repeat Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Griffith, Timothy B.
    Allen, Benjamin J.
    Levy, Bruce A.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Dahm, Diane L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (06) : 1296 - 1301
  • [26] Effects of remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Huanyu
    Fu, Zicai
    Zhong, Mingjin
    Deng, Zhenhan
    Wang, Chen
    Sun, Yijia
    Zhu, Weimin
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [27] Meta-analysis comparing bioabsorbable versus metal interference screw for adverse and clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Laupattarakasem, Pat
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Kosuwon, Weerachai
    Laupattarakasem, Wiroon
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (01) : 142 - 153
  • [28] Irradiated allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective studies
    Wang, Hong-De
    Zhu, Yan-Bin
    Wang, Tian-Rui
    Zhang, Wei-Fei
    Zhang, Ying-Ze
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 49 : 45 - 55
  • [29] Use of electromyographic biofeedback in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ananias, Joaquin
    Vidal, Catalina
    Ortiz-Munoz, Luis
    Irarrazaval, Sebastian
    Besa, Pablo
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2024, 123 : 19 - 29
  • [30] Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ra, Ho Jong
    Kim, Jun-Ho
    Lee, Dae-Hee
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (07) : 923 - 931