Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes After 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Mitchell, Justin J.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Dean, Chase S.
    Cinque, Mark
    Matheny, Lauren M.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (08) : 1790 - 1798
  • [2] Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xiaoke
    Yan, Lei
    Li, Dijun
    Fan, Zijuan
    Liu, Haifeng
    Wang, Guishan
    Jiu, Jingwei
    Yang, Ziquan
    Li, Jiao Jiao
    Wang, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (03) : 719 - 734
  • [3] Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Di
    Pan, Jian-ke
    Lin, Fang-zheng
    Luo, Ming-hui
    Liang, Gui-hong
    Zeng, Ling-feng
    Huang, He-tao
    Han, Yan-hong
    Xu, Nan-jun
    Yang, Wei-yi
    Liu, Jun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (11) : 3053 - 3075
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of early versus delayed reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Ai-Feng
    Guo, Tian-Ci
    Yu, Wei-Jie
    Chen, Ji-Xin
    Zhai, Jing -Bo
    KNEE, 2023, 44 : 43 - 58
  • [5] Outpatient versus inpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Ferrari, Deisi
    Lopes, Thiago J. A.
    Franca, Paulo F. A.
    Azevedo, Fabio M.
    Pappas, Evangelos
    KNEE, 2017, 24 (02) : 197 - 206
  • [6] Optimal Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shen, Xianyue
    Liu, Tong
    Xu, Shenghao
    Chen, Bo
    Tang, Xiongfeng
    Xiao, Jianlin
    Qin, Yanguo
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (11) : E2242742
  • [7] Tranexamic Acid in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Johns, William L.
    Walley, Kempland C.
    Hammoud, Sommer
    Gonzalez, Tyler A.
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    Patel, Nirav K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (14) : 4030 - 4041
  • [8] Patellar tendon versus artificial grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, DingYuan
    Ma, Jia
    Zhang, Lei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [9] Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mok, Anthony C.
    Fancher, Andrew J.
    Vopat, Matthew L.
    Baker, Jordan
    Tarakemeh, Armin
    Mullen, Scott
    Schroeppel, John P.
    Templeton, Kim
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    Vopat, Bryan G.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [10] Clinical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Lima, Diego Ariel
    de Lima, Lana Lacerda
    Reis de Souza, Nayara Gomes
    de Moraes Perez, Rodrigo Amorim
    Sobrado, Marcel Faraco
    Guimaraes, Tales Mollica
    Helito, Camilo Partezani
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (01)