The effect of vapocoolant spray on pain due to intravenous cannulation in children: a randomized controlled trial

被引:75
作者
Farion, Ken J. [3 ,4 ]
Splinter, Karen L. [5 ]
Newhook, Kym [1 ]
Gaboury, Isabelle [2 ]
Splinter, William M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Eastern Ontario, Emergency Dept, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
[2] Childrens Hosp Eastern Ontario, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Dept Pediat, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Emergency Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Anesthesiol, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.070874
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Established noninvasive pharmacologic means of alleviating pain and anxiety in children undergoing intravenous cannulation are time-consuming, and thus impractical for routine use in the emergency department. Vapocoolant sprays provide transient skin anesthesia within seconds of application. We compared the effect of a new vapocoolant spray to placebo on pain due to intravenous cannulation in children. Methods: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, which we conducted between June 1 and Sept. 12, 2006, 80 children aged 6-12 years received either vapocoolant spray or placebo before cannulation. Children rated their pain using a 100-mm colour visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included success rate on first attempt at cannulation and pain ratings by the children's parents, nurses and child life specialists. Results: We found a modest but significant reduction in pain with the use of vapocoolant spray (mean difference 19 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-32 mm; p < 0.01). Cannulation on first attempt was more often successful with the use of vapocoolant spray (85.0%) than with placebo (62.5%) (mean difference 22.5%, 95% CI 3.2%-39.9%; p = 0.03). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 cannulation failure was 5 (95% CI 3-32). Parents (p = 0.04), nurses (p = 0.01) and child life specialists (p < 0.01) considered the children's pain to be reduced with the use of vapocoolant spray. Interpretation: The vapocoolant spray in our study quickly and effectively reduced pain due to intravenous cannulation in children and improved the success rate of cannulation. It is an important option to reduce childhood procedural pain in emergency situations, especially when time precludes traditional interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The use of a topical refrigerant anesthetic to reduce injection pain in children [J].
Abbott, K ;
FowlerKerry, S .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1995, 10 (08) :584-590
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, AM J DRUG DELIV, DOI [10.2165/00137696-200402020-00002, DOI 10.2165/00137696-200402020-00002]
[3]   Topical anesthetics in children: agents and techniques that equally comfort patients, parents, and clinicians [J].
Chen, BK ;
Cunningham, BB .
CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2001, 13 (04) :324-330
[4]   Children's expectations and memories of acute distress: Short- and long-term efficacy of pain management interventions [J].
Cohen, LL ;
Blount, RL ;
Cohen, RJ ;
Ball, CM ;
McClellan, CB ;
Bernard, RS .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 26 (06) :367-374
[5]   Ethyl vinyl chloride vapocoolant spray fails to decrease pain associated with intravenous cannulation in children [J].
Costello, Mary ;
Ramundo, Maria ;
Christopher, Norman C. ;
Powell, Keith R. .
CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2006, 45 (07) :628-632
[6]   Incorporating psychological approaches into routine paediatric venepuncture [J].
Duff, AJA .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2003, 88 (10) :931-937
[7]  
*GEB CO, FREQ ASK QUEST GEB P
[8]  
GROSSI E, 1983, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V1, P337
[9]  
Houck Constance S, 2005, Expert Rev Neurother, V5, P625, DOI 10.1586/14737175.5.5.625
[10]   A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA® for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient [J].
Jimenez, N ;
Bradford, H ;
Seidel, KD ;
Sousa, M ;
Lynn, AM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (02) :411-414