Oral Streptococci Biofilm Formation on Different Implant Surface Topographies

被引:39
作者
Cardoso Pita, Pedro Paulo [1 ]
Rodrigues, Jose Augusto [1 ,2 ]
Ota-Tsuzuki, Claudia [1 ]
Miato, Tatiane Ferreira [1 ]
Zenobio, Elton G. [3 ]
Giro, Gabriela [1 ]
Figueiredo, Luciene C. [1 ]
Goncalves, Cristiane [1 ]
Gehrke, Sergio A. [4 ]
Cassoni, Alessandra [1 ]
Shibli, Jamil Awad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guarulhos, Dent Res Div, Dept Periodontol & Oral Implantol, BR-07023070 Guarulhos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Guarulhos, Dent Res Div, Dept Operat Dent, BR-07023070 Guarulhos, SP, Brazil
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Minas Gerais, Dept Oral Implantol, BR-30535901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[4] Biotecnos Tecnol & Ciencia Ltda, BR-97015001 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
关键词
BACTERIAL-COLONIZATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; IN-VIVO; TITANIUM; SUPRAGINGIVAL; MICROBIOLOGY; ADSORPTION; ROUGHNESS; ADHERENCE; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.1155/2015/159625
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The establishment of the subgingival microbiota is dependent on successive colonization of the implant surface by bacterial species. Different implant surface topographies could influence the bacterial adsorption and therefore jeopardize the implant survival. This study evaluated the biofilm formation capacity of five oral streptococci species on two titanium surface topographies. In vitro biofilm formation was induced on 30 titanium discs divided in two groups: sandblasted acid-etched (SAE-n = 15) and as-machined (M-n = 15) surface. The specimens were immersed in sterilized whole human unstimulated saliva and then in fresh bacterial culture with five oral streptococci species: Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, and Streptococcus cricetus. The specimens were fixed and stained and the adsorbed dye was measured. Surface characterization was performed by atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Surface and microbiologic data were analyzed by Student's t-test and two-way ANOVA, respectively (p < 0.05). S. cricetus, S. mutans, and S. sobrinus exhibited higher biofilm formation and no differences were observed between surfaces analyzed within each species (p > 0.05). S. sanguinis exhibited similar behavior to form biofilm on both implant surface topographies, while S. salivarius showed the lowest ability to form biofilm. It was concluded that biofilm formation on titanium surfaces depends on surface topography and species involved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of different surface topographies of titanium implants on bacterial biofilm: a systematic review
    Dhaliwal, Jagjit Singh
    Rahman, Nurul Adhwa
    Knights, Joe
    Ghani, Hazim
    de Albuquerque Junior, Rubens Ferreira
    [J]. SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (06):
  • [22] Clinical and In Situ Oral Biofilm Formation on Dental Implant Abutment Materials: A Systematic Review
    Del Rey, Yumi Chokyu
    Parize, Hian
    Pedrazzi, Vinicius
    dos Reis, Andrea Candido
    do Nascimento, Cassio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (04) : 639 - 652
  • [23] The influence of surface nanoroughness, texture and chemistry of TiZr implant abutment on oral biofilm accumulation
    Xing, Rui
    Lyngstadaas, Stale P.
    Ellingsen, Jan Eirik
    Taxt-Lamolle, Sebastien
    Haugen, Havard J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (06) : 649 - 656
  • [24] Biofilm formation on dental implants with different surface micro-topography: An in vitro study
    Bermejo, Patricia
    Carmen Sanchez, Maria
    Llama-Palacios, Arancha
    Figuero, Elena
    Herrera, David
    Sanz Alonso, Mariano
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (08) : 725 - 734
  • [25] Surface coating strategies to prevent biofilm formation on implant surfaces
    Bruellhoff, Kristina
    Fiedler, Joerg
    Moeller, Martin
    Groll, Juergen
    Brenner, Rolf E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2010, 33 (09) : 646 - 653
  • [26] The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation
    Kligman, Stefanie
    Ren, Zhi
    Chung, Chun-Hsi
    Perillo, Michael Angelo
    Chang, Yu-Cheng
    Koo, Hyun
    Zheng, Zhong
    Li, Chenshuang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (08)
  • [27] Osteoblast Mechanoresponses on Ti with Different Surface Topographies
    Sato, N.
    Kubo, K.
    Yamada, M.
    Hori, N.
    Suzuki, T.
    Maeda, H.
    Ogawa, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 88 (09) : 812 - 816
  • [28] Biofilm Formation on Dental Restorative and Implant Materials
    Busscher, H. J.
    Rinastiti, M.
    Siswomihardjo, W.
    van der Mei, H. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 89 (07) : 657 - 665
  • [29] In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites cured under different surface conditions
    Ionescu, Andrei C.
    Cazzaniga, Gloria
    Ottobelli, Marco
    Ferracane, Jack L.
    Paolone, Gaetano
    Brambilla, Eugenio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 77 : 78 - 86
  • [30] An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: Structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces
    Sanchez, M. C.
    Llama-Palacios, A.
    Fernandez, E.
    Figuero, E.
    Marin, M. J.
    Leon, R.
    Blanc, V.
    Herrera, D.
    Sanz, M.
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (10) : 1161 - 1171