Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult): An update

被引:766
作者
Hewitson, Paul [1 ]
Glasziou, Paul [1 ]
Watson, Eila [2 ]
Towler, Bernie [3 ]
Irwig, Les [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Hlth Care, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[3] Dept Hlth & Aging Serv, Macarthur, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) may be achieved by the introduction of population-based screening programs. The aim of the systematic review was to update previous research to determine whether screening for CRC using the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) reduces CRC mortality and to consider the benefits, harms, and potential consequences of screening. METHODS: We searched eight electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED, SIGLE, and HMIC). We identified nine articles describing four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving over 320,000 participants with follow-up ranging from 8 to 18 yr. The primary analyses used intention to screen and a secondary analysis adjusted for nonattendance. We calculated the relative risks and risk differences for each trial, and then overall, using fixed and random effects models. RESULTS: Combined results from the four eligible RCTs indicated that screening had a 16% reduction in the relative risk (RR) of CRC mortality (RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.90). There was a 15% RR reduction (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92) in CRC mortality for studies that used biennial screening. When adjusted for screening attendance in the individual studies, there was a 25% RR reduction (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.84) for those attending at least one round of screening using the FOBT. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.02) or all-cause mortality excluding CRC (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: The present review includes seven new publications and unpublished data concerning CRC screening using FOBT. This review confirms previous research demonstrating that FOBT screening reduces the risk of CRC mortality. The results also indicate that there is no difference in all-cause mortality between the screened and nonscreened populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1541 / 1549
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Anderson WF, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1126
  • [2] New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy
    Avidan, B
    Sonnenberg, A
    Schnell, TG
    Leya, J
    Metz, A
    Sontag, SJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (06) : 1524 - 1529
  • [3] Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale
    Berg, AO
    Allan, JD
    Frame, PS
    Homer, CJ
    Johnson, MS
    Klein, JD
    Lieu, TA
    Mulrow, CD
    Orleans, CT
    Peipert, JF
    Pender, NJ
    Siu, AL
    Teutsch, SM
    Westhoff, C
    Woolf, SH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (02) : 129 - 131
  • [4] Black WC, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P167, DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.3.167
  • [5] The case for direct colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
    Bond, JH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (02) : 263 - 265
  • [6] Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy
    Brenner, H
    Arndt, V
    Stürmer, T
    Stegmaier, C
    Zieger, H
    Dhom, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (07) : 972 - 976
  • [7] Fecal occult blood screening in the Minnesota study: Sensitivity of the screening test
    Church, TR
    Ederer, F
    Mandel, JS
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (19): : 1440 - 1448
  • [8] Church TR, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P861, DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.11.861
  • [9] Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence
    Citarda, F
    Tomaselli, G
    Capocaccia, R
    Barcherini, S
    Crespi, M
    [J]. GUT, 2001, 48 (06) : 812 - 815
  • [10] *COCHR COLL, 2003, VERS 4 2 WIND