Extended RAS and BRAF Mutation Analysis Using Next-Generation Sequencing

被引:27
|
作者
Sakai, Kazuko [1 ]
Tsurutani, Junji [2 ]
Yamanaka, Takeharu [3 ]
Yoneshige, Azusa [4 ]
Ito, Akihiko [4 ]
Togashi, Yosuke [1 ]
De Velasco, Marco A. [1 ]
Terashima, Masato [1 ]
Fujita, Yoshihiko [1 ]
Tomida, Shuta [1 ]
Tamura, Takao [2 ]
Nakagawa, Kazuhiko [2 ]
Nishio, Kazuto [1 ]
机构
[1] Kinki Univ, Fac Med, Dept Genome Biol, Sayama, Osaka, Japan
[2] Kinki Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Sayama, Osaka, Japan
[3] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Biostat, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232, Japan
[4] Kinki Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Sayama, Osaka, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE; CETUXIMAB; FLUOROURACIL; LEUCOVORIN; PANITUMUMAB; KRAS; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0121891
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Somatic mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF genes are related to resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies in colorectal cancer. We have established an extended RAS and BRAF mutation assay using a next-generation sequencer to analyze these mutations. Multiplexed deep sequencing was performed to detect somatic mutations within KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF, including minor mutated components. We first validated the technical performance of the multiplexed deep sequencing using 10 normal DNA and 20 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. To demonstrate the potential clinical utility of our assay, we profiled 100 FFPE tumor samples and 15 plasma samples obtained from colorectal cancer patients. We used a variant calling approach based on a Poisson distribution. The distribution of the mutation-positive population was hypothesized to follow a Poisson distribution, and a mutation-positive status was defined as a value greater than the significance level of the error rate (alpha = 2 x 10(-5)). The cut-off value was determined to be the average error rate plus 7 standard deviations. Mutation analysis of 100 clinical FFPE tumor specimens was performed without any invalid cases. Mutations were detected at a frequency of 59% (59/100). KRAS mutation concordance between this assay and Scorpion-ARMS was 92% (92/100). DNA obtained from 15 plasma samples was also analyzed. KRAS and BRAF mutations were identified in both the plasma and tissue samples of 6 patients. The genetic screening assay using next-generation sequencer was validated for the detection of clinically relevant RAS and BRAF mutations using FFPE and liquid samples.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determining the Mutation Bias of Favipiravir in Influenza Virus Using Next-Generation Sequencing
    Goldhill, Daniel H.
    Langat, Pinky
    Xie, Hongyao
    Galiano, Monica
    Miah, Shahjahan
    Kellam, Paul
    Zambon, Maria
    Lackenby, Angie
    Barclay, Wendy S.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2019, 93 (02)
  • [22] Variant mapping and mutation discovery in inbred mice using next-generation sequencing
    Jabier Gallego-Llamas
    Andrew E. Timms
    Krista A. Geister
    Anna Lindsay
    David R. Beier
    BMC Genomics, 16
  • [23] The thrills and agonies of using next-generation sequencing for somatic mutation detection in cancer
    Tsongalis, Gregory J.
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (04) : 369 - 371
  • [24] Variant mapping and mutation discovery in inbred mice using next-generation sequencing
    Gallego-Llamas, Jabier
    Timms, Andrew E.
    Geister, Krista A.
    Lindsay, Anna
    Beier, David R.
    BMC GENOMICS, 2015, 16
  • [25] Genomic Mutation Landscape of Primary Breast Lymphoma: Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis
    Zhang, Wenqi
    Huang, Chen
    Liu, Jingjing
    Wu, Lili
    Zhang, Huichao
    Wu, Xiaolin
    Wang, Lianjing
    Li, Weijing
    Liu, Wei
    Liu, Lihong
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2022, 2022
  • [26] Next-generation sequencing for next-generation breeding, and more
    Tsai, Chung-Jui
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2013, 198 (03) : 635 - 637
  • [27] Next-Generation Sequencing: Next-Generation Quality in Pediatrics
    Wortmann, Saskia B.
    Spenger, Johannes
    Preisel, Martin
    Koch, Johannes
    Rauscher, Christian
    Bader, Ingrid
    Mayr, Johannes A.
    Sperl, Wolfgang
    PADIATRIE UND PADOLOGIE, 2018, 53 (06): : 278 - 283
  • [28] Next-Generation Sequencing Demands Next-Generation Phenotyping
    Hennekam, Raoul C. M.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2012, 33 (05) : 884 - 886
  • [29] Next-generation sequencing
    Haferlach, T.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 40 - 41
  • [30] Next-Generation Sequencing
    Xiong, Momiao
    Zhao, Zhongming
    Arnold, Jonathan
    Yu, Fuli
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010,