Knowledge Graph Representation Learning-Based Forest Fire Prediction

被引:20
作者
Chen, Jiahui [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yi [3 ]
Peng, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Luanjie [1 ,2 ]
Ge, Xingtong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 101408, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Automat, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
forest fire; graph neural network; disaster prediction; knowledge graph; link prediction; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/rs14174391
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forest fires destroy the ecological environment and cause large property loss. There is much research in the field of geographic information that revolves around forest fires. The traditional forest fire prediction methods hardly consider multi-source data fusion. Therefore, the forest fire predictions ignore the complex dependencies and correlations of the spatiotemporal kind that usually bring valuable information for the predictions. Although the knowledge graph methods have been used to model the forest fires data, they mainly rely on artificially defined inference rules to make predictions. There is currently a lack of a representation and reasoning methods for forest fire knowledge graphs. We propose a knowledge-graph- and representation-learning-based forest fire prediction method in this paper for addressing the issues. First, we designed a schema for the forest fire knowledge graph to fuse multi-source data, including time, space, and influencing factors. Then, we propose a method, RotateS2F, to learn vector-based knowledge graph representations of the forest fires. We finally leverage a link prediction algorithm to predict the forest fire burning area. We performed an experiment on the Montesinho Natural Park forest fire dataset, which contains 517 fires. The results show that our method reduces mean absolute deviation by 28.61% and root-mean-square error by 53.62% compared with the previous methods.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NEW TRENDS ART INT P
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT C LEARNING REPRE
[3]  
[Anonymous], FIRE MAP NASA
[4]  
Antoniou G, 2003, IN HAND I S, P67
[5]   An ontology-based methodology for hazard identification and causation analysis [J].
Aziz, Abdul ;
Ahmed, Salim ;
Khan, Faisal I. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 123 :87-98
[6]   Predicting wildfire burns from big geodata using deep learning [J].
Bergado, John Ray ;
Persello, Claudio ;
Reinke, Karin ;
Stein, Alfred .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 140
[7]   Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Modeling and Prediction [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Jaafari, Abolfazl ;
Avand, Mohammadtaghi ;
Al-Ansari, Nadhir ;
Tran Dinh Du ;
Hoang Phan Hai Yen ;
Tran Van Phong ;
Duy Huu Nguyen ;
Hiep Van Le ;
Mafi-Gholami, Davood ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Hoang Thi Thuy ;
Tran Thi Tuyen .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (06)
[8]   Ensemble lightning prediction models for the province of Alberta, Canada [J].
Blouin, Karen D. ;
Flannigan, Mike D. ;
Wang, Xianli ;
Kochtubajda, Bohdan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2016, 25 (04) :421-432
[9]  
Bordes A., 2013, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, P2787
[10]   Fire activity in Portugal and its relationship to weather and the Canadian Fire Weather Index System [J].
Carvalho, A. ;
Flannigan, M. D. ;
Logan, K. ;
Miranda, A. I. ;
Borrego, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2008, 17 (03) :328-338