Interference of Raphanus sativus in Soybean Cultivars' Yield

被引:17
作者
Bianchi, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
Fleck, N. G. [3 ]
Agostinetto, D. [4 ]
Rizzardi, M. A. [5 ]
机构
[1] CCGL Tecnol, BR-98100970 Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Cruz Alta, BR-98100970 Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, BR-90046900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Pelotas, Dep Fitossanidade, Fac Agron Eliseu Maciel, Pelotas, Brazil
[5] Univ Passo Fundo, Fac Agron & Med Vet, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
关键词
Glycine max; competitivity; weed; forage turnip; WEED SUPPRESSIVE ABILITY; GLYCINE-MAX CULTIVAR; WHEAT-VARIETIES; LOLIUM-RIGIDUM; COMPETITION; OBTUSIFOLIA; SELECTION; SICKLEPOD; DENSITY; TRAITS;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582011000400008
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The strong dependence on herbicides for weed control in soybean has led to the selection of tolerant and/or resistant weed plants. Besides the use of herbicides, integrated management includes techniques such as cultivar competitive ability to control weed plants. This work aimed to evaluate cultivar response to competition with forage turnip (Raphanus sativus) and to identify carriers of superior competitive ability. The experiment was carried out under field conditions in Cruz Alta-RS, during the 2000/01 season. Two competition conditions (absence and presence of forage turnip during the soybean vegetative growth stage) were tested in combination with 11 soybean cultivars. The effect of forage turnip competition varies among cultivars, characterizing genetic variability, which permits the selection of genotypes with higher competitive ability. Forage turnip competition reduces plant height, twig average length and soybean grain yield. Among the soybean genotypes used, the cultivar M Soy 6101 shows outstanding competitive ability due to its higher grain yield potential, both with and without forage turnip competition.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 792
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[2]  
Bennett AC, 2000, WEED SCI, V48, P431, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0431:EOGMCA]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Bianchi M.A., 2006, Planta daninha, V24, P629, DOI 10.1590/S0100-83582006000400003
[5]  
Buhler DD, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P273, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0273:AIAAOF]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Callaway M. B., 1992, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, V7, P169, DOI 10.1017/S088918930000477X
[8]  
Chemale V. M., 1982, Planta Daninha, V5, P36, DOI 10.1590/S0100-83581982000200006
[9]  
Crotser MP, 2003, WEED SCI, V51, P208, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0208:NDSAFR]2.0.CO
[10]  
2