Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study

被引:9
|
作者
Meca-Lallana, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Ayuso, Teresa [3 ]
Martinez-Yelamos, Sergio [4 ]
Duran, Carmen [5 ]
Contreras Martin, Yessica [6 ]
Herrera Navarro, Nicolas [7 ]
Perez Sempere, Angel [8 ]
Alvarez-Cermeno, Jose C. [9 ]
Millan Pascual, Jorge [10 ]
Meca-Lallana, Virginia [11 ]
Romero Sevilla, Raul [12 ]
Ricart, Javier [12 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Univ Virgen Arrixaca IMIB ARRIXACA, Serv Neurol, Unidad Esclerosis Multiple, Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Catolica San Antonio, UCAM, Catedra Neuroinmunol Clin & Esclerosis Multiple, Murcia, Spain
[3] Hosp Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Hosp Bellvitge Princeps Espanya, Lhospitalet De Llobregat, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Nuestra Senora Candelaria, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[7] Hosp Burgos, Burgos, Spain
[8] Hosp Gen Alicante, Alicante, Spain
[9] Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
[10] Complejo Hosp La Mancha Ctr, Alcazar De San Juan, Spain
[11] Hosp Univ Princesa, Unidad Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Madrid, Spain
[12] Novartis Farmaceut SA, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Second-line treatment; Effectiveness; Fingolimod; Natalizumab; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1159/000505778
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a lack of head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of fingolimod (FIN) and natalizumab (NTZ) as second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: Multicenter, observational study, in which, information of 388 patients randomly selected and treated with FIN or NTZ in routine clinical practice was retrospectively collected with the main objective of comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the first year, after FIN or NTZ treatment initiation. Results: Mean ARR during the first year of treatment was 0.28 in FIN group and 0.12 in NTZ group (p = 0.0064); nevertheless, the difference between groups lost statistical significance when the propensity score analysis was performed. Time to disability -progression was similar in both treatment groups (12.3 +/- 6.7 months in FIN, and 12.8 +/- 0.1 months in NTZ; p = 0.4654). Treatment persistence after the first year of treatment was higher in patients treated with FIN (95%) than in those treated with NTZ (84%; p = 0.0014). Conclusions: After 12 months of treatment, both FIN and NTZ reduced the ARR, but ARR percent reduction was significantly higher with NTZ. Treatment persistence was higher in patients receiving FIN.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study
    Kalincik, Tomas
    Brown, J. William L.
    Robertson, Neil
    Willis, Mark
    Scolding, Neil
    Rice, Claire M.
    Wilkins, Alastair
    Pearson, Owen
    Ziemssen, Tjalf
    Hutchinson, Michael
    McGuigan, Christopher
    Jokubaitis, Vilija
    Spelman, Tim
    Horakova, Dana
    Havrdova, Eva
    Trojano, Maria
    Izquierdo, Guillermo
    Lugaresi, Alessandra
    Prat, Alexandre
    Girard, Marc
    Duquette, Pierre
    Grammond, Pierre
    Alroughani, Raed
    Pucci, Eugenio
    Sola, Patrizia
    Hupperts, Raymond
    Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
    Terzi, Murat
    Van Pesch, Vincent
    Rozsa, Csilla
    Grand'Maison, Francois
    Boz, Cavit
    Granella, Franco
    Slee, Mark
    Spitaleri, Daniele
    Olascoaga, Javier
    Bergamaschi, Roberto
    Verheul, Freek
    Vucic, Steve
    McCombe, Pamela
    Hodgkinson, Suzanne
    Sanchez-Menoyo, Jose Luis
    Ampapa, Radek
    Simo, Magdolna
    Csepany, Tunde
    Ramo, Cristina
    Cristiano, Edgardo
    Barnett, Michael
    Butzkueven, Helmut
    Coles, Alasdair
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (04) : 271 - 281
  • [32] Analysis of the budgetary impact of alemtuzumab as second-line therapy, compared to natalizumab and fingolimod, in patients previously treated with interferon beta 1b, diagnosed with active recurrent remitting multiple sclerosis, treated in the Costa Rican social security fund
    Quiros, Luis Pastor
    Ugalde, Rocio
    GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2019,
  • [33] Comparative Effectiveness of Natalizumab Versus Anti-CD20 in Highly Active Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis After Fingolimod Withdrawal
    Fabien Rollot
    Justine Couturier
    Romain Casey
    Sandrine Wiertlewski
    Marc Debouverie
    Jean Pelletier
    Jérôme De Sèze
    Pierre Labauge
    Aurélie Ruet
    Eric Thouvenot
    Jonathan Ciron
    Eric Berger
    Olivier Gout
    Pierre Clavelou
    Bruno Stankoff
    Olivier Casez
    Bertrand Bourre
    Hélène Zephir
    Thibault Moreau
    Christine Lebrun-Frenay
    Elisabeth Maillart
    Gilles Edan
    Jean-Philippe Neau
    Alexis Montcuquet
    Philippe Cabre
    Jean-Philippe Camdessanché
    Gilles Defer
    Haifa Ben Nasr
    Aude Maurousset
    Karolina Hankiewicz
    Corinne Pottier
    Emmanuelle Leray
    Sandra Vukusic
    David-Axel Laplaud
    Neurotherapeutics, 2022, 19 : 476 - 490
  • [34] When should second-line treatment of multiple sclerosis be started?
    Losy, Jacek
    AKTUALNOSCI NEUROLOGICZNE, 2015, 15 (03): : 124 - 129
  • [35] Cost-minimization analysis of alemtuzumab compared to fingolimod and natalizumab for the treatment of active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the Netherlands
    Piena, M. A.
    Heisen, M.
    Wormhoudt, L. W.
    van Wingerden, J.
    Frequin, S. T. F. M.
    Uitdehaag, B. M. J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (10) : 968 - 976
  • [36] Effectiveness of second-line antiretroviral therapy: the impact of drug switches
    Braga, Leticia Penna
    Pinto Mendicino, Cassia Cristina
    Reis, Edna Afonso
    Carmo, Ricardo Andrade
    Menezes de Padua, CristianeAparecida
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2017, 29 (12): : 1585 - 1588
  • [37] A randomized study of natalizumab dosing regimens for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Trojano, Maria
    Ramio-Torrenta, Lluis
    Grimaldi, Luigi M. E.
    Lubetzki, Catherine
    Schippling, Sven
    Evans, Karleyton C.
    Ren, Zheng
    Muralidharan, Kumar Kandadi
    Licata, Stephanie
    Gafson, Arie R.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (14) : 2240 - 2253
  • [38] Fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study in Iran
    Rezaee, Mehdi
    Izadi, Sadegh
    Keshavarz, Khosro
    Borhanihaghighi, Afshin
    Ravangard, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (04) : 297 - 305
  • [39] Real-world effectiveness of fingolimod in Polish group of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Walczak, Agata
    Kurkowska-Jastrzebska, Iwona
    Zakrzewska-Pniewska, Beata
    Dorobek, Malgorzata
    Brola, Waldemar
    Zajdel, Radoslaw
    Bartosik-Psujek, Halina
    Stasiolek, Mariusz
    Kulakowska, Alma
    Rusek, Stanislaw
    Tutaj, Andrzej
    Glabinski, Andrzej
    Wlodek, Agata
    Kochanowski, Jan
    Ciach, Agnieszka
    Siger, Malgorzata
    Kurowska, Katarzyna
    Wicha, Wojciech
    Nojszewska, Monika
    Podlecka-Pietowska, Aleksandra
    Czajka, Anna
    Kapica-Topczewska, Katarzyna
    Bielecki, Bartosz
    Maciagowska-Terela, Marzena
    Stepien, Adam
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 184
  • [40] Modified Rio Score with Platform Therapy Predicts Treatment Success with Fingolimod and Natalizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
    Jamroz-Wisniewska, Anna
    Zajdel, Radoslaw
    Slowik, Agnieszka
    Marona, Monika
    Wnuk, Marcin
    Adamczyk-Sowa, Monika
    Adamczyk, Bozena
    Lasek-Bal, Anetta
    Puz, Przemyslaw
    Steposz, Arkadiusz
    Krzystanek, Ewa
    Patalong-Ogiewa, Maja
    Pokryszko-Dragan, Anna
    Budrewicz, Slawomir
    Koziarska, Dorota
    Karbicka, Anna
    Wawrzyniak, Slawomir
    Fryze, Waldemar
    Furtak-Niczyporuk, Marzena
    Rejdak, Konrad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (09)