Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study

被引:9
|
作者
Meca-Lallana, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Ayuso, Teresa [3 ]
Martinez-Yelamos, Sergio [4 ]
Duran, Carmen [5 ]
Contreras Martin, Yessica [6 ]
Herrera Navarro, Nicolas [7 ]
Perez Sempere, Angel [8 ]
Alvarez-Cermeno, Jose C. [9 ]
Millan Pascual, Jorge [10 ]
Meca-Lallana, Virginia [11 ]
Romero Sevilla, Raul [12 ]
Ricart, Javier [12 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Univ Virgen Arrixaca IMIB ARRIXACA, Serv Neurol, Unidad Esclerosis Multiple, Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Catolica San Antonio, UCAM, Catedra Neuroinmunol Clin & Esclerosis Multiple, Murcia, Spain
[3] Hosp Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Hosp Bellvitge Princeps Espanya, Lhospitalet De Llobregat, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Nuestra Senora Candelaria, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[7] Hosp Burgos, Burgos, Spain
[8] Hosp Gen Alicante, Alicante, Spain
[9] Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
[10] Complejo Hosp La Mancha Ctr, Alcazar De San Juan, Spain
[11] Hosp Univ Princesa, Unidad Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Madrid, Spain
[12] Novartis Farmaceut SA, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Second-line treatment; Effectiveness; Fingolimod; Natalizumab; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1159/000505778
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a lack of head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of fingolimod (FIN) and natalizumab (NTZ) as second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: Multicenter, observational study, in which, information of 388 patients randomly selected and treated with FIN or NTZ in routine clinical practice was retrospectively collected with the main objective of comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the first year, after FIN or NTZ treatment initiation. Results: Mean ARR during the first year of treatment was 0.28 in FIN group and 0.12 in NTZ group (p = 0.0064); nevertheless, the difference between groups lost statistical significance when the propensity score analysis was performed. Time to disability -progression was similar in both treatment groups (12.3 +/- 6.7 months in FIN, and 12.8 +/- 0.1 months in NTZ; p = 0.4654). Treatment persistence after the first year of treatment was higher in patients treated with FIN (95%) than in those treated with NTZ (84%; p = 0.0014). Conclusions: After 12 months of treatment, both FIN and NTZ reduced the ARR, but ARR percent reduction was significantly higher with NTZ. Treatment persistence was higher in patients receiving FIN.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differential Effects of Fingolimod and Natalizumab on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
    Grahl, S.
    Bussas, M.
    Wiestler, B.
    Eichinger, P.
    Gaser, C.
    Kirschke, J.
    Zimmer, C.
    Berthele, A.
    Hemmer, B.
    Muehlau, M.
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 18 (04) : 2589 - 2597
  • [22] Cyclophosphamide as second-line therapy in multiple sclerosis: benefits and risks
    Rinaldi, Luciano
    Perini, P.
    Calabrese, M.
    Gallo, P.
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 30 : 171 - 173
  • [23] Cyclophosphamide as second-line therapy in multiple sclerosis: benefits and risks
    Luciano Rinaldi
    P. Perini
    M. Calabrese
    P. Gallo
    Neurological Sciences, 2009, 30 : 171 - 173
  • [24] The Transition From First-Line to Second-Line Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis
    Jan Dörr
    Friedemann Paul
    Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2015, 17
  • [25] Switching therapy from natalizumab to fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings
    Rinaldi, F.
    Seppi, D.
    Calabrese, M.
    Perini, P.
    Gallo, P.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (11) : 1640 - 1643
  • [26] Evolution of the healthcare expenditure in Italy and effects of fingolimod increased prescribing in second line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Ruggeri, Matteo
    Aiello, Andrea
    D'Ausilio, Anna
    Di Brino, Eugenio
    Cottone, Salvatore
    Ghezzi, Angelo
    Lombardozzi, Lorella
    Mecozzi, Alessandra
    Sacchini, Dario
    Roccia, Alessandro
    Mangone, Monica
    Toumi, Mondher
    GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 3 (03) : 125 - 133
  • [27] Switching Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Breakthrough Disease to Second-Line Therapy
    Castillo-Trivino, Tamara
    Mowry, Ellen M.
    Gajofatto, Alberto
    Chabas, Dorothee
    Crabtree-Hartman, Elizabeth
    Cree, Bruce A.
    Goodin, Douglas S.
    Green, Ari J.
    Okuda, Darin T.
    Pelletier, Daniel
    Zamvil, Scott S.
    Vittinghoff, Eric
    Waubant, Emmanuelle
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (02):
  • [28] Alemtuzumab - a new drug in the therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The first or second line of treatment?
    Zaborski, Jacek
    AKTUALNOSCI NEUROLOGICZNE, 2015, 15 (03): : 144 - 149
  • [29] Effect of Rituximab Compared with Natalizumab and Fingolimod in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Cohort Study
    Hernandez-Preciado, Martha Rocio
    Marquez-Pedroza, Jazmin
    Sanchez-Rosales, Nayeli Alejandra
    Garcia-Rivera, Jose de Jesus
    Kobayashi-Gutierrez, Antonio
    Torres-Mendoza, Blanca Miriam
    Chavarria-Avila, Efrain
    Montano-Serrano, Raul Alejandro
    Cortes-Enriquez, Fernando
    Mireles-Ramirez, Mario Alberto
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (13)
  • [30] Cost effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and natalizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Stephanie R. Earnshaw
    Jonathan Graham
    MerriKay Oleen-Burkey
    Jane Castelli-Haley
    Kenneth Johnson
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2009, 7 (2) : 91 - 108