Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study

被引:9
|
作者
Meca-Lallana, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Ayuso, Teresa [3 ]
Martinez-Yelamos, Sergio [4 ]
Duran, Carmen [5 ]
Contreras Martin, Yessica [6 ]
Herrera Navarro, Nicolas [7 ]
Perez Sempere, Angel [8 ]
Alvarez-Cermeno, Jose C. [9 ]
Millan Pascual, Jorge [10 ]
Meca-Lallana, Virginia [11 ]
Romero Sevilla, Raul [12 ]
Ricart, Javier [12 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Univ Virgen Arrixaca IMIB ARRIXACA, Serv Neurol, Unidad Esclerosis Multiple, Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Catolica San Antonio, UCAM, Catedra Neuroinmunol Clin & Esclerosis Multiple, Murcia, Spain
[3] Hosp Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Hosp Bellvitge Princeps Espanya, Lhospitalet De Llobregat, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Nuestra Senora Candelaria, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[7] Hosp Burgos, Burgos, Spain
[8] Hosp Gen Alicante, Alicante, Spain
[9] Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
[10] Complejo Hosp La Mancha Ctr, Alcazar De San Juan, Spain
[11] Hosp Univ Princesa, Unidad Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Madrid, Spain
[12] Novartis Farmaceut SA, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Second-line treatment; Effectiveness; Fingolimod; Natalizumab; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1159/000505778
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a lack of head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of fingolimod (FIN) and natalizumab (NTZ) as second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: Multicenter, observational study, in which, information of 388 patients randomly selected and treated with FIN or NTZ in routine clinical practice was retrospectively collected with the main objective of comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the first year, after FIN or NTZ treatment initiation. Results: Mean ARR during the first year of treatment was 0.28 in FIN group and 0.12 in NTZ group (p = 0.0064); nevertheless, the difference between groups lost statistical significance when the propensity score analysis was performed. Time to disability -progression was similar in both treatment groups (12.3 +/- 6.7 months in FIN, and 12.8 +/- 0.1 months in NTZ; p = 0.4654). Treatment persistence after the first year of treatment was higher in patients treated with FIN (95%) than in those treated with NTZ (84%; p = 0.0014). Conclusions: After 12 months of treatment, both FIN and NTZ reduced the ARR, but ARR percent reduction was significantly higher with NTZ. Treatment persistence was higher in patients receiving FIN.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Lorscheider, Johannes
    Benkert, Pascal
    Lienert, Carmen
    Hanni, Peter
    Derfuss, Tobias
    Kuhle, Jens
    Kappos, Ludwig
    Yaldizli, Ozgur
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06) : 777 - 785
  • [2] Are Natalizumab and Fingolimod Analogous Second-Line Options for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis? A Clinical Practice Observational Study
    Gajofatto, Alberto
    Bianchi, Maria Rachele
    Deotto, Luciano
    Benedetti, Maria Donata
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2014, 72 (3-4) : 173 - 180
  • [3] Cost minimisation analysis of fingolimod vs natalizumab as a second line of treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Crespo, C.
    Izquierdo, G.
    Garcia-Ruiz, A.
    Granell, M.
    Brosa, M.
    NEUROLOGIA, 2014, 29 (04): : 210 - 217
  • [4] The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Boz, Cavit
    Ozakbas, Serkan
    Terzi, Murat
    Karabudak, Rana
    Sevim, Serhan
    Turkoglu, Recai
    Soysal, Aysun
    Balci, Belgin Petek
    Efendi, Husnu
    Turan, Omer Faruk
    Yuceyar, Nur
    Yetkin, Mehmet Fatih
    Karahan, Serap Zengin
    Demirkiran, Meltem
    Guler, Sibel
    Agan, Kadriye
    Kiylioglu, Nefati
    Baba, Cavid
    Tuncer, Asli
    Koseoglu, Mesrure
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 44 (06) : 2121 - 2129
  • [5] Efficacy of fingolimod is superior to injectable disease modifying therapies in second-line therapy of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Braune, Stefan
    Lang, M.
    Bergmann, A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2016, 263 (02) : 327 - 333
  • [6] Efficacy of fingolimod is superior to injectable disease modifying therapies in second-line therapy of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Stefan Braune
    M. Lang
    A. Bergmann
    Journal of Neurology, 2016, 263 : 327 - 333
  • [7] Natalizumab is effective as second line therapy in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Putzki, N.
    Kollia, K.
    Woods, S.
    Igwe, E.
    Diener, H. C.
    Limmroth, V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (03) : 424 - 426
  • [8] The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Cavit Boz
    Serkan Ozakbas
    Murat Terzi
    Rana Karabudak
    Serhan Sevim
    Recai Turkoglu
    Aysun Soysal
    Belgin Petek Balcı
    Hüsnü Efendi
    Ömer Faruk Turan
    Nur Yüceyar
    Mehmet Fatih Yetkin
    Serap Zengin Karahan
    Meltem Demirkıran
    Sibel Guler
    Kadriye Agan
    Nefati Kıylıoğlu
    Cavid Baba
    Asli Tuncer
    Mesrure Köseoğlu
    Neurological Sciences, 2023, 44 : 2121 - 2129
  • [9] Switching to Second-Line Therapies in Interferon-Beta-Treated Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
    Portaccio, E.
    Zipoli, V.
    Siracusa, G.
    Sorbi, S.
    Amato, M. P.
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2009, 61 (03) : 177 - 182
  • [10] Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies
    Baroncini, Damiano
    Ghezzi, Angelo
    Annovazzi, Pietro O.
    Colombo, Bruno
    Martinelli, Vittorio
    Minonzio, Giorgio
    Moiola, Lucia
    Rodegher, Mariaemma
    Zaffaroni, Mauro
    Comi, Giancarlo
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (10) : 1315 - 1326