The efficacy of open nephron-sparing surgery in the treatment of complex renal cell carcinoma

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, T. -Y. [1 ]
Li, J. [1 ]
Wen, X. -H. [1 ]
Zhang, H. [1 ]
Gui, Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhumadian Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Nephron-sparing surgery; Complex renal cell carcinoma; Radical nephrectomy; Laparoscopy; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; TUMORS; ISCHEMIA; OUTCOMES; MASSES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of open nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in the treatment of complex renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 118 patients with complex renal cell carcinoma (T1N0M0, clear cell carcinoma) were included in this study, and assigned into open radical nephrectomy (RN) group (35 patients), open NSS group (45 patients) and laparoscopic NSS group (38 patients). After 3 years of follow-up, the clinical efficacy was analyzed. RESULTS: Both the mean surgery time and ischemia blocking time in the open NSS group were comparable to those in the RN group, and significantly shorter than the laparoscopic NSS group, p < 0.05. The rate of positive margin in the open NSS group was significantly lower than the laparoscopic NSS group. The occurrence of total complications in the open NSS group was comparable to that in the laparoscopic NSS group and significantly lower than the RN group. The successful rate of surgery in the open NSS group was significantly higher than the laparoscopic NSS group, p < 0.05. The 75% survival was 30.0 months in the RN group, > 35.0 months in the open NSS group and 34.0 months in the laparoscopic NSS group, the difference was significant (p < 0.001). The mortality was similar in the open NSS group and the laparoscopic NSS group, and significantly smaller than the RN group, p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Open NSS was more safe and effective in the treatment of complex renal cell carcinoma than RN and laparoscopic NSS.
引用
收藏
页码:3959 / 3964
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is nephron-sparing surgery appropriate for a small renal-cell carcinoma?
    Marshall, FF
    LANCET, 1996, 348 (9020): : 72 - 73
  • [22] NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY FOR RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA WITH VENOUS INVOLVEMENT
    ANGERMEIER, KW
    NOVICK, AC
    STREEM, SB
    MONTIE, JE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (06): : 1352 - 1355
  • [23] Where are the limits of elective nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma?
    Schlichter, A
    Wunderlich, H
    Junker, K
    Kosmehl, H
    Zermann, DH
    Schubert, J
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (05) : 517 - 520
  • [24] Clinical efficacy of radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery on localized renal cell carcinoma
    Li, Wentao
    Cheng, Yanlei
    Cheng, Yi
    Ren, Hui
    Han, Na
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 19 : 58
  • [25] ANATOMICAL BACKGROUND FOR NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA
    SAMPAIO, FJB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (04): : 999 - 1005
  • [26] CURRENT CONTROVERSIES IN NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY FOR RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA
    STEINBACH, F
    STOCKLE, M
    HOHENFELLNER, R
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 13 (03) : 163 - 165
  • [27] Functional and oncological outcomes of open nephron-sparing surgery for complex renal masses
    Bahouth, Zaher
    Halachmi, Sarel
    Getzler, Itamar
    Caspin, Orna
    Moskovitz, Boaz
    Nativ, Ofer
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (10) : 427.e11 - 427.e16
  • [28] Clinical efficacy of radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery on localized renal cell carcinoma
    Wentao Li
    Yanlei Cheng
    Yi Cheng
    Hui Ren
    Na Han
    European Journal of Medical Research, 19
  • [29] Minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatment options for renal cell carcinoma
    Novick, AC
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 6 (05): : 181 - 184
  • [30] Open and Robotic Nephron-Sparing Surgery for T1b or Greater Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Singh, A.
    Worthington, J.
    Hunt, S.
    Wheelock, A.
    Galen, N.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S21 - S21