Chinese Preschoolers' Resource Allocation in the Face of Existing Inequality Under Collaborative and Noncollaborative Contexts

被引:21
作者
Chai, Qiao [1 ]
He, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Psychol & Behav Sci, Xixi Campus,148 Tianmushan Rd, Hangzhou 310028, ZJ, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
collaboration; cultural difference; equality; merit; material welfare; PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR; CHILDRENS; FAIRNESS; EQUALITY; CULTURE; NEED;
D O I
10.1037/dev0000359
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The current study investigated the stage at which Chinese preschoolers started considering recipients' material welfare and minimizing existing inequalities under both noncollaborative and collaborative contexts. Also, it analyzed how they behaved when recipients' material welfare was in conflict with merit or equality rule. Experiment 1 found that 4-year-old children allocated resources to the poor rather than the rich character only under the noncollaborative context but not under the collaborative context, in which they had observed these 2 characters working together to finish a task. By contrast, 5-year-old children started doing so under both collaborative and noncollaborative contexts. When there was conflict between recipients' material welfare and merit in Experiment 2, 6-year-old children did not show any preference for either material welfare or merit, and they made equal or almost equal distributions. Without collaboration information, Experiment 3 further revealed that the children aged from 4 to 6 y preferred equal distribution to resource allocation considering recipients' material welfare. These findings have been discussed in terms of contextual information and cultural influences.
引用
收藏
页码:1494 / 1500
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Fairness and the Development of Inequality Acceptance
    Almas, Ingvild
    Cappelen, Alexander W.
    Sorensen, Erik O.
    Tungodden, Bertil
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2010, 328 (5982) : 1176 - 1178
  • [2] Preschoolers Are Able to Take Merit into Account When Distributing Goods
    Baumard, Nicolas
    Mascaro, Olivier
    Chevallier, Coralie
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 48 (02) : 492 - 498
  • [3] The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies
    Blake, P. R.
    McAuliffe, K.
    Corbit, J.
    Callaghan, T. C.
    Barry, O.
    Bowie, A.
    Kleutsch, L.
    Kramer, K. L.
    Ross, E.
    Vongsachang, H.
    Wrangham, R.
    Warneken, F.
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 528 (7581) : 258 - +
  • [4] The developmental origins of fairness: the knowledge-behavior gap
    Blake, Peter R.
    McAuliffe, Katherine
    Warneken, Felix
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (11) : 559 - 561
  • [5] Chen X., 2010, The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology, P37, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199541850.013.0005, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541850.013.0005]
  • [6] EQUITY, EQUALITY, AND NEED - WHAT DETERMINES WHICH VALUE WILL BE USED AS BASIS OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
    DEUTSCH, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1975, 31 (03) : 137 - 149
  • [7] Examining the Diversity of Prosocial Behavior: Helping, Sharing, and Comforting in Infancy
    Dunfield, Kristen
    Kuhlmeier, Valerie A.
    O'Connell, Laura
    Kelley, Elizabeth
    [J]. INFANCY, 2011, 16 (03) : 227 - 247
  • [8] DWORKIN R, 1981, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V10, P185
  • [9] Egalitarianism in young children
    Fehr, Ernst
    Bernhard, Helen
    Rockenbach, Bettina
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 454 (7208) : 1079 - U22
  • [10] The developmental roots of fairness: infants' reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources
    Geraci, Alessandra
    Surian, Luca
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 14 (05) : 1012 - 1020