Changes in Abortion Rates Between 2000 and 2008 and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion

被引:138
作者
Jones, Rachel K. [1 ]
Kavanaugh, Megan L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alan Guttmacher Inst, Div Res, New York, NY 10038 USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; NATIONAL-SURVEY; FAMILY GROWTH; CONTRACEPTIVE USE; SERVICES; ACCESS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c405e
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate abortion rates among subpopulations of women in 2008, assess changes in subpopulation abortion rates since 2000, and estimate the lifetime incidence of abortion. METHODS: We combined secondary data from several sources, including the 2008 Abortion Patient Survey, the Current Population Surveys for 2008 and 2009, and the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth, to estimate abortion rates by subgroup and lifetime incidence of abortion for U. S. women of reproductive age. RESULTS: The abortion rate declined 8.0% between 2000 and 2008, from 21.3 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 to 19.6 per 1,000. Decreases in abortion were experienced by most subgroups of women. One notable exception was poor women; this group accounted for 42.4% of abortions in 2008, and their abortion rate increased 17.5% between 2000 and 2008 from 44.4 to 52.2 abortions per 1,000. In addition to poor women, abortion rates were highest for women who were cohabiting (52.0 per 1,000), aged 20-24 (39.9 per 1,000), or non-Hispanic African American (40.2 per 1,000). If the 2008 abortion rate prevails, 30.0% of women will have an abortion by age 45. CONCLUSION: Abortion is becoming increasingly concentrated among poor women, and restrictions on abortion disproportionately affect this population. (Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1358-66) DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c405e
引用
收藏
页码:1358 / 1366
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, BAD EC BLAM WOM DEL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, A real-time look at the impact of the recession on women's family planning and pregnancy decisions
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MMWR MORBID MORTAL W
[4]   How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation [J].
Casper, LM ;
Cohen, PN .
DEMOGRAPHY, 2000, 37 (02) :237-245
[5]  
DeNavas-Walt C., 2009, Income, poverty and health insurance coverage in US, P60
[6]   Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001 [J].
Finer, Larence B. ;
Henshaw, Stanley K. .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2006, 38 (02) :90-96
[7]   UNINTENDED PREGNANCY AMONG AMERICAN-WOMEN [J].
FORREST, JD .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1987, 19 (02) :76-77
[8]   Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth [J].
Fu, HS ;
Darroch, JE ;
Henshaw, SK ;
Kolb, E .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 30 (03) :128-+
[9]   Unintended pregnancy in the United States [J].
Henshaw, SK .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 30 (01) :24-+
[10]   Abortion patients in 1994-1995: Characteristics and contraceptive use [J].
Henshaw, SK ;
Kost, K .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 28 (04) :140-&