Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:34
作者
Dolan, Russell D. [1 ]
Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat [1 ]
McCarty, Thomas R. [1 ]
Thompson, Christopher C. [1 ]
Aihara, Hiroyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Endoscopy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
THE-SCOPE DEVICE; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; RECURRENT; NEOPLASIA; EFFICACY; SAFETY; FTRD; CLIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.039
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a novel endoscopic technique for the resection of GI lesions not amenable to standard endoscopic therapy. The primary aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate EFTR for the resection of colorectal lesions. Methods: Individualized searches were developed through October 2020 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Random-effects models were used to determine pooled technical success, margin-negative (R-0) resection, adverse events, procedure duration, and rate of recurrence at follow-up. Subgroup analysis was used to assess the impact of specific procedure techniques and regression analyses to determine influence of lesion size. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-2 statistics and publication bias by funnel plots using Egger and Begg tests. Results: Fourteen studies (1936 subjects; 39.6% women) were included. Most EFTR lesions were located in the colon (75.8%) with the remaining in the rectum. Mean procedure duration was 45.4 +/- 11.4 minutes. Pooled technical success was 87.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.1-89.8; I-2 = 33), R-0 resection rate was 78.8% (95% CI, 75.7-81.5; I-2 = 33), procedure-associated adverse events occurred in 12.2% (95% CI, 9.3-15.9; I-2 = 61), and recurrence rate was 12.6% (95% CI, 11.1-14.4; I-2 = 0) over an average weighted follow-up of 20.1 +/- 3.8 weeks. Regression analyses revealed significantly lower R-0 resection (odds ratio, .3; 95% CI, .2-.6; I-2 = 61; P = .0003) and higher overall procedure-associated adverse event rates (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.8-7.2; I-2 = 55; P = .0004) for lesions >20 mm. Conclusions: EFTR overall appears to be an effective modality with high technical success and R-0 resection rate with a relatively low risk of adverse events and recurrence, with greatest success when lesions are <20 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / +
页数:27
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) of colorectal neoplasms with the Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD): Clinical experience from two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland
    Aepli, Patrick
    Criblez, Dominique
    Baumeler, Stephan
    Borovicka, Jan
    Frei, Remus
    [J]. UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (03) : 463 - 470
  • [2] Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) in the lower gastrointestinal tract
    Albrecht, H.
    Raithel, M.
    Braun, A.
    Nagel, A.
    Stegmaier, A.
    Utpatel, K.
    Schaefer, C.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (10) : 957 - 963
  • [3] Colo-rectal endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with the over-the-scope device (FTR®): A multicenter Italian experience
    Andrisani, G.
    Soriani, P.
    Manno, M.
    Pizzicannella, M.
    Pugliese, F.
    Mutignani, M.
    Naspetti, R.
    Petruzziello, L.
    Iacopini, F.
    Grossi, C.
    Lagoussis, P.
    Vavassori, S.
    Coppola, F.
    La Terra, A.
    Ghersi, S.
    Cecinato, P.
    De Nucci, G.
    Salerno, R.
    Pandolfi, M.
    Costamagna, G.
    Di Matteo, F. M.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2019, 51 (03) : 375 - 381
  • [4] Colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection using a novel, flat-base over-the-scope clip: a prospective study
    Backes, Yara
    Kappelle, Wouter F. W.
    Berk, Luuk
    Koch, Arjun D.
    Groen, John N.
    Cappel, Wouter H. De Vos Tot Nederveen
    Schwartz, Matthijs P.
    Kerkhof, Marjon
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Schroeder, Roland
    Tan, T. G.
    Lacle, Miangela M.
    Vleggaar, Frank P.
    Moons, Leon M. G.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (11) : 1092 - 1097
  • [5] Endoscopic full thickness resection in the colo-rectum: outcomes from the UK Registry
    Boger, Philip
    Rahman, Imdadur
    Hu, Maxworth
    Ayaru, Laksh
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Chedgy, Fergus
    Green, Susi
    Hayat, Mumtaz
    Hopper, Andrew D.
    Ishaq, Sauid
    Martin, John
    McCallum, Iain
    Phull, Perminder
    Pugh, Stirling
    Russo, Evangelos
    Suzuki, Noriko
    Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
    Zeino, Zeino
    Patel, Praful
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 33 (06) : 852 - 858
  • [6] Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity
    Borenstein, Michael
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2017, 8 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [7] A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
    Borenstein, Michael
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [8] Endoscopy robotics: Current and future applications
    Boskoski, Ivo
    Costamagna, Guido
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 31 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [9] Endoscopic full-thickness resection of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice: a prospective observational case study
    Bronzwaer, Maxime E. S.
    Bastiaansen, Barbara A. J.
    Koens, Lianne
    Dekker, Evelien
    Fockens, Paul
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (09) : E1112 - E1119
  • [10] Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of Colorectal Lesions with the New FTRD System: Single-Center Experience
    de-Ferro, Susana Mao
    Castela, Joana
    Pereira, Daniela
    Chaves, Paula
    Pereira, Antonio Dias
    [J]. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 235 - 241