Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review

被引:65
作者
Amjad, Sana [1 ]
Chojecki, Dagmara [2 ]
Osornio-Vargas, Alvaro [3 ]
Ospina, Maria B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, John W Scott Hlth Sci Lib, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Pediat, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Wildfire; Pregnancy; Adverse birth outcomes; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; PRETERM BIRTH; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; AIR-POLLUTION; FETAL HEALTH; WEIGHT; SMOKE; QUALITY; STRESS; PM2.5;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2021.106644
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Maternal wildfire exposure (e.g., smoke, stress) has been associated with poor birth outcomes with effects potentially mediated through air pollution and psychosocial stress. Despite the recent hike in the intensity and frequency of wildfires in some regions of the world, a critical appraisal of the evidence on the association between maternal wildfire exposure and adverse birth outcomes has not yet been undertaken. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the scientific evidence on the association between wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Methods: Comprehensive searches in nine bibliographic databases were conducted from database inception up to June 2020. Observational epidemiological studies that evaluated associations between exposure to wildfire during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Studies were assessed using the National Toxicology Program's Office of Health Assessment and Translation (NTP OHAT) risk of bias tool and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Screening of retrieved articles, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Study results were synthesized descriptively. Results: Eight epidemiological studies conducted in four countries and involving 1,702,252 births were included in the review. The exposure to wildfire during pregnancy was assessed in individual studies by measurement of PM2.5 (n = 2), PM10 (n = 1), Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) aerosol index (n = 1), heat spots (n = 1), and by proximity of maternal residence to wildfire-affected areas (n = 3). There is some evidence indicating that maternal wildfire exposure associates with birth weight reduction (n = 7) and preterm birth (n = 4), particularly when exposure to wildfire smoke occurred in late pregnancy. The association between wildfire exposure and small for gestational age (n = 2) and infant mortality (n = 1) was inconclusive. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that maternal exposure to wildfire during late pregnancy is linked to reduced birth weight and preterm birth. Well-designed comprehensive studies are needed to better understand the perinatal effects of wildfires.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Impact of Wildfire Smoke on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Colorado, 2007-2015
    Abdo, Mona
    Ward, Isabella
    O'Dell, Katelyn
    Ford, Bonne
    Pierce, Jeffrey R.
    Fischer, Emily V.
    Crooks, James L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (19)
  • [2] Post-Traumatic Stress among Evacuees from the 2016 Fort McMurray Wildfires: Exploration of Psychological and Sleep Symptoms Three Months after the Evacuation
    Belleville, Genevieve
    Ouellet, Marie-Christine
    Morin, Charles M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (09)
  • [3] Wildfire smoke exposure and human health: Significant gaps in research for a growing public health issue
    Black, Carolyn
    Tesfaigzi, Yohannes
    Bassein, Jed A.
    Miller, Lisa A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 55 : 186 - 195
  • [4] Ambient particulate matter and preterm birth or birth weight: a review of the literature
    Bosetti, Cristina
    Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
    Gallus, Silvano
    Cipriani, Sonia
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Parazzini, Fabio
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 84 (06) : 447 - 460
  • [5] Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene
    Bowman, David M. J. S.
    Kolden, Crystal A.
    Abatzoglou, John T.
    Johnston, Fay H.
    van der Werf, Guido R.
    Flannigan, Mike
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 1 (10) : 500 - 515
  • [6] Effect of Prenatal Exposure to Wildfire-generated PM2.5 on Birth Weight
    Breton, Carrie
    Park, Caron
    Wu, Jun
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) : S66 - S66
  • [7] Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
    Campbell, Mhairi
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Sowden, Amanda
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Brennan, Sue E.
    Ellis, Simon
    Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie
    Ryan, Rebecca
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Thomas, James
    Welch, Vivian
    Thomson, Hilary
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
  • [8] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019, WILDF SMOK PREG
  • [9] Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Cumpston, Miranda
    Li, Tianjing
    Page, Matthew J.
    Chandler, Jacqueline
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thomas, James
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10):
  • [10] Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world
    Doerr, Stefan H.
    Santin, Cristina
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1696)