The accessibility, readability, and quality of online resources for gender affirming surgery

被引:24
|
作者
Vargas, Christina R. [1 ]
Ricci, Joseph A. [2 ]
Lee, Michelle [2 ]
Tobias, Adam M. [2 ]
Medalie, Daniel A. [3 ]
Lee, Bernard T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Boston, MA USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Transgender surgery; Reconstructive surgery; Readability; Health literacy; HEALTH LITERACY; PATIENT RESOURCES; DECISION-MAKING; TRANSGENDER; DISPARITIES; CARE; PHYSICIANS; INDIVIDUALS; INFORMATION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The transgender population is disproportionally affected by health disparities related to access to care. In many communities, transgender specialists are geographically distant and locally available medical professionals may be unfamiliar with unique needs of transgender patients. As a result, use of Internet resources for information about gender affirming surgery is particularly important. This study simulates a patient search for online educational material about gender affirming surgery and evaluates the accessibility, readability, and quality of the information. Methods: An Internet search for the term "transgender surgery" was performed, and the first 10 relevant hits were identified. Readability was assessed using 10 established tests: Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, FORCAST, Fry, Gunning Fog, New Dale-Chall, New Fog Count, Raygor Estimate, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Flesch Reading Ease. Quality was assessed using Journal of the American Medical Association criteria and the DISCERN instrument. Results: Review of 69 results was required to identify 10 sites with relevant patient information. There were 97 articles collected; overall mean reading level was 14.7. Individual Web site reading levels ranged from 12.0 to 17.5. All articles and Web sites exceeded the recommended sixth grade level. Quality ranged from 0 to 4 (Journal of the American Medical Association) and 35 to 79 (DISCERN) across Web sites. Conclusions: Web sites with relevant patient information about gender affirming surgery were difficult to identify from search results. The content of these sites universally exceeded the recommended reading level. A wide range of Web site quality was noted, and this may further complicate successful navigation. Barriers in access to appropriately written patient information on the Internet may contribute to disparities in referral, involvement, satisfaction, and outcomes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 206
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Readability, complexity, and suitability analysis of online lymphedema resources
    Tran, Bao Ngoc N.
    Singh, Mansher
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Rudd, Rima
    Singhal, Dhruv
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 213 : 251 - 260
  • [42] Masculinizing Gender Affirming Surgery
    El-Arabi, Ahmad M.
    Barrera, Ellis P.
    McLaren, Hillary E.
    Gray, Meredith
    Grimstad, Frances W.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2021, 37 (04) : 275 - 282
  • [43] Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources
    Haas, Kevin
    Brillante, Christie
    Sharp, Lisa
    Elzokaky, Ahmed K.
    Pasquinelli, Mary
    Feldman, Lawrence
    Kovitz, Kevin L.
    Joo, Min
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [44] Online Readability Analysis: Mohs Micrographic Surgery Postsurgical Wound Care
    Dowdle, Travis S.
    Nguyen, Jeannie M.
    Steadman, Jesse N.
    Layher, Heather
    Sturgeon, Ashley L. E.
    Akin, Russell
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2022, 35 (04) : 213 - 218
  • [45] Online Resources for Patients Considering Hiatal Hernia Repair: a Quality and Readability Analysis
    Rouhi, Armaun D.
    Ghanem, Yazid K.
    Hoeltzel, Gerard D.
    Bader, Elizabeth
    Yi, William S.
    Williams, Noel N.
    Dumon, Kristoffel R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (03) : 598 - 600
  • [46] Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information
    Broderick, James M.
    McCarthy, Andrea
    Hogan, Niall
    KNEE, 2021, 28 : 139 - 150
  • [47] Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis
    Hua, Hong-Uyen
    Rayess, Nadim
    Li, Angela S. S.
    Do, Diana
    Rahimy, Ehsan
    JOURNAL OF VITREORETINAL DISEASES, 2022, 6 (06) : 437 - 442
  • [48] Readability of online dermatology patient education resources
    Natarelli, Nicole
    Nguyen, Lynn
    Botto, Elizabeth
    Coughlin, Emily
    Krenitsky, Amanda
    Albers, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2024, 38 (11) : e917 - e919
  • [49] Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources
    Phillips, Nicole A.
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 39 (01) : 147 - 153
  • [50] Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery
    Chang, Michelle
    Weiss, Barry
    Worrell, Stephanie
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    Ghaderi, Iman
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 5259 - 5265