'Would you eat cultured meat?': Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom

被引:253
作者
Verbeke, Wim [1 ]
Marcu, Afrodita [2 ]
Rutsaert, Pieter [1 ,3 ]
Gaspar, Rui [4 ,5 ]
Seibt, Beate [4 ,6 ]
Fletcher, Dave [7 ]
Barnett, Julie [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Surrey, Sch Psychol, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[3] Int Rice Res Inst, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines
[4] Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, Cis IUL, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Univ Evora, Dept Psicol, Ctr Invest Educ & Psicol, Escola Ciencias Sociais, P-7005345 Evora, Portugal
[6] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
[7] White October, Oxford OX4 1LF, England
[8] Univ Bath, Dept Psychol, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
Attitude; Consumer; Cultured; In-vitro; Meat; Synthetic; FOOD; TECHNOLOGIES; BEEF; CONSUMPTION; PREFERENCES; CHALLENGES; ACCEPTANCE; QUALITY; CITIZEN; PUBLICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Cultured meat has evolved from an idea and concept into a reality with the August 2013 cultured hamburger tasting in London. Still, how consumers conceive cultured meat is largely an open question. This study addresses consumers' reactions and attitude formation towards cultured meat through analyzing focus group discussions and online deliberations with 179 meat consumers from Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Initial reactions when learning about cultured meat were underpinned by feelings of disgust and considerations of unnaturalness. Consumers saw few direct personal benefits but they were more open to perceiving global societal benefits relating to the environment and global food security. Both personal and societal risks were framed in terms of uncertainties about safety and health, and possible adverse societal consequences dealing with loss of farming and eating traditions and rural livelihoods. Further reflection pertained to skepticism about 'the inevitable' scientific progress, concern about risk governance and control, and need for regulation and proper labeling. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 58
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, Research methods for clinical and Health Psychology, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849209793
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, FLYCATCHER 1218
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Livestock long shadowEnvironmental Issues and Options, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[4:D]2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, The Guardian
  • [6] Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: a modelling study
    Aston, Louise M.
    Smith, James N.
    Powles, John W.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (05):
  • [7] Environmentally Sustainable Meat Consumption: An Analysis of the Norwegian Public Debate
    Austgulen, Marthe Harvik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY, 2014, 37 (01) : 45 - 66
  • [8] Barnett J, 2008, ONLINE DELIBERATIVE
  • [9] Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK
    Barnett, Julie
    Burningham, Kate
    Walker, Gordon
    Cass, Noel
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (01) : 36 - 50
  • [10] Batra S.K., 2008, Consumer Behavior Text and Cases