Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:104
|
作者
Huang, Jia-Yan [1 ]
Li, Jia-Wu [1 ]
Lu, Qiang [1 ]
Luo, Yan [1 ]
Lin, Ling [1 ]
Shi, Yu-Jun [2 ]
Li, Tao [3 ]
Liu, Ji-Bin [4 ]
Lyshchik, Andrej [4 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Med Ultrasound, West China Hosp, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Lab Pathol, West China Hosp, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, West China Hosp, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CONTRAST-ENHANCED-ULTRASOUND; CLINICAL-PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; HEPATOCARCINOGENESIS; CIRRHOSIS; UPDATE; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT; CT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019191086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: American College of Radiology contrast agent-enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS)was developed to improve the accuracy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis at contrast agent-enhanced US. However, to the knowledge of the authors, the diagnostic accuracy of the system in characterization of liver nodules 20 mm or smaller has not been fully evaluated. Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS in diagnosing HCC in liver nodules 20 mm or smaller in patients at risk for HCC. Materials and Methods: Between January 2015 and February 2018, consecutive patients at risk for HCC presenting with untreated liver nodules 20 mm or less were enrolled in this retrospective double-reader study. Each nodule was categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS and World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB)-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) criteria. Diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS and WFUMB-EFSUMB characterization was evaluated by using tissue histologic analysis, multiphase contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, and imaging followup-as reference standard and compared by using McNemar test. Results: The study included 175 nodules (mean diameter, 16.1 mm +/- 3.4) in 172 patients (mean age, 51.8 years +/- 10.6; 136 men). The sensitivity of CEUS LR-5 versus WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria in diagnosing HCC was 73.3% (95% confidence interval[CI]: 63.8%, 81.5%) versus 88.6% (95% CI: 80.9%, 94%), respectively (P<.001). The specificity of CEUS LR-5 versus WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria was 97.1% (95% CI: 90.1%, 99.7%) versus 87.1% (95% CI: 77%, 94%), respectively (P =.02). No malignant lesions were found in CEUS LR-1 and LR-2 categories. Only two nodules (of 41; 5%, both HCC) were malignant in CEUS LR-3 category. The incidences of HCC in CEUS LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M were 48% (11 of 23), 98% (77 of 79), and 75%(15 of 20), respectively. Two of 175 (1.1%) histologic analysis-confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were categorized as CEUS LR-M by CEUS LI-RADS and misdiagnosed as HCC by WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria. Conclusion: The contrast-enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) algorithm was an effective tool for characterization of small (<= 20 mm) liver nodules in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Compared with World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology criteria, CEUS LR-5 demonstrated higher specificity for diagnosing small HCCs with lower sensitivity. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 339
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] New Arterial Phase Enhancing Nodules on MRI of Cirrhotic Liver: Risk of Progression to Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Implications for LI-RADS Classification
    Smereka, Paul
    Doshi, Ankur M.
    Lavelle, Lisa P.
    Shanbhogue, Krishna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (02) : 382 - 389
  • [32] Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS
    Schellhaas, Barbara
    Hammon, Matthias
    Strobel, Deike
    Pfeifer, Lukas
    Kielisch, Christian
    Goertz, Ruediger S.
    Cavallaro, Alexander
    Janka, Rolf
    Neurath, Markus F.
    Uder, Michael
    Seuss, Hannes
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (10) : 4254 - 4264
  • [33] Optimizing diagnostic imaging data using LI-RADS and the Likert scale in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Morad, Kholoud
    Moustafa, Amr F.
    Refaat, Amal M.
    AbdEllatif, Ahmed
    ElAzab, Mohammed S.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 86 : E557 - E563
  • [34] Efficacy of Multiple Modified Methods of Criteria for LR-M Liver Nodules of Different Sizes Clinical Practice and Discussion in CEUS LI-RADS Version 2017
    Lin, Weizhen
    He, Na
    Zeng, Qingjin
    Wu, Lili
    Qiu, Shaodong
    Zheng, Rongqin
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (12) : 2739 - 2748
  • [35] Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) for Differentiating Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Jiawu
    Yang, Lulu
    Ma, Lin
    Lu, Qiang
    Luo, Yan
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2021, 42 (02): : 187 - 193
  • [36] Performance of current versus modified CEUS LI-RADS in the diagnosis of non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancies
    Wen, Rong
    Huang, Fen
    Lin, Peng
    Gao, Ruizhi
    Pang, Jinshu
    Wu, Yuquan
    Yin, Haihui
    Tang, Zhiping
    Ma, Zhen
    He, Yun
    Yang, Hong
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (12) : 3688 - 3695
  • [37] Performance of current versus modified CEUS LI-RADS in the diagnosis of non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancies
    Rong Wen
    Fen Huang
    Peng Lin
    Ruizhi Gao
    Jinshu Pang
    Yuquan Wu
    Haihui Yin
    Zhiping Tang
    Zhen Ma
    Yun He
    Hong Yang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 3688 - 3695
  • [38] Expanding the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 diagnostic population: performance and reliability of LI-RADS for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver carcinoma in patients who do not meet strict LI-RADS high-risk criteria
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Cannella, Roberto
    Tsai, Richard
    Naeem, Muhammad
    LeBlanc, Maverick
    Salter, Amber
    Tsung, Allan
    Fleckenstein, Jaquelyn
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    HPB, 2019, 21 (12) : 1697 - 1706
  • [39] Can Risk Stratification Based on Ultrasound Elastography of Background Liver Assist CEUS LI-RADS in the Diagnosis of HCC?
    Li, Jiawu
    Ling, Wenwu
    Chen, Shuang
    Yang, Lulu
    Ma, Lin
    Lu, Qiang
    Luo, Yan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [40] Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 on CT for Determining Eligibility for Liver Transplant According to Milan Criteria in Patients at High Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kyoung Bun
    Kim, Haeryoung
    Han, Joon Koo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (01) : 86 - 96