Landslide susceptibility mapping of Kalimpong in Eastern Himalayan Region using a Rprop ANN approach

被引:9
作者
Roy, Pamir [1 ]
Ghosal, Kaushik [2 ]
Paul, Prabir Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Engn Sci & Technol, Sibpur, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Inst Engn Sci & Technol, Dept Min Engn, Sibpur, W Bengal, India
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility mapping; remote sensing; GIS; resilient back propagation; artificial neural network; Kalimpong; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; FREQUENCY RATIO; GEOMORPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; MODELS; AREA; TURKEY; INDEX; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12040-022-01877-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Kalimpong district, a part of the Darjeeling Himalaya, exhibits a variety of factors that are ideal for the occurrence of landslides. Therefore, it is imperative to demarcate the zones that are highly susceptible to landslide phenomena in advance, so that the risk, and hence the damage can be reduced to a significant extent through proper land-use planning. The factors that have been considered for this study are: (1) elevation, (2) slope, (3) aspect, (4) curvature, (5) distance to drainage, (6) soil type, (7) rainfall, (8) distance to lineaments, (9) landuse, (10) distance to road, (11) TWI, and (12) NDVI. For landslide susceptibility mapping of Kalimpong district, a resilient back propagation (Rprop) artificial neural networks (ANN) approach was used in this study. The results of the Rprop ANN model were validated using the AUC of the ROC Curves. The prediction rate AUC value was found to be 84.35% which showed that this combination of factors with the Rprop ANN model gave satisfactory accuracy in agreement with past landslide phenomena. The derived landslide susceptibility map was categorized in extremely low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility zones covering 610, 272, 83, 61, and 66.7 km(2) of Kalimpong's area, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm [J].
Akgun, A. ;
Sezer, E. A. ;
Nefeslioglu, H. A. ;
Gokceoglu, C. ;
Pradhan, B. .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 38 (01) :23-34
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, REP ACC DEATHS 2010
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GEOM FIELD GUID BOOK
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IS 1893-Part1
[5]   The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan [J].
Ayalew, L ;
Yamagishi, H .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2005, 65 (1-2) :15-31
[6]   Influence of sample and terrain unit on landslide susceptibility assessment at La Pobla de Lillet, Eastern Pyrenees, Spain [J].
Baeza, Cristina ;
Lantada, N. ;
Moya, J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2010, 60 (01) :155-167
[7]  
Balasubramani K, 2013, DISASTER ADV, V6, P38
[8]   Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management [J].
Beguería, S .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2006, 37 (03) :315-329
[9]  
Beven KJ., 1979, Hydrol. Sci. J, V24, P43, DOI [10.1080/02626667909492051, DOI 10.1080/02626667909492051, DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834, 10.1080/02626667909491834]
[10]   Landslide susceptibility modeling using Reduced Error Pruning Trees and different ensemble techniques: Hybrid machine learning approaches [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Singh, Sushant K. ;
Shirzadi, Ataollah ;
Shahabi, Himan ;
Thi-Thu-Trang Tran ;
Dieu Tien Buig .
CATENA, 2019, 175 :203-218