What hinders adoption of the electric bus in Canadian transit? Perspectives of transit providers

被引:66
作者
Mohamed, Moataz [1 ]
Ferguson, Mark [2 ]
Kanaroglou, Pavlos [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, McMaster Inst Transportat & Logist, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Sch Geog & Earth Sci, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
Electric bus; Grounded theory; Transit electrification; Operational feasibility; In-depth interviews; FUEL-CELL HYBRID; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; TOTAL-COST; VEHICLES; OPTIONS; IMPACT; PERCEPTION; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is increasing advocacy for the electrification of mobility choices to reduce transport related GHG emissions. Bus transit has been always considered a promising context for electric power train technologies. Current market shares, however, tell a different story with a very small share for electric powertrains. This study identifies factors that hinder the implementation of the electric bus in the public transit context as seen from the perspective of service providers. A grounded theory analysis of 11 in-depth interviews yielded 55 themes/concerns, allocated over four categories, that appear to govern the adoption of the electric bus in Canadian transit. Risk mitigation, operational capabilities, and cost reductions are identified as significantly influencing the perspective of service providers and consequently the potential of the electric bus to penetrate the marketplace. The findings also highlighted that: political support, Canadian-based operational data, standardization, and demonstration projects are essential components that would move transit providers towards electric powertrains. Overall, the study provides a detailed blueprint for a feasible path towards implementation of the electric bus technologies in the urban transit context.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 149
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]   Simulation of electric buses on a full transit network: Operational feasibility and grid impact analysis [J].
Mohamed, Moataz ;
Farag, Hany ;
El-Taweel, Nader ;
Ferguson, Mark .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2017, 142 :163-175
[32]   A sensitivity analysis of total cost of ownership for electric public bus transport systems in Swedish medium sized cities [J].
Nurhadi, Lisiana ;
Boren, Sven ;
Ny, Henrik .
17TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT2014, 2014, 3 :818-827
[33]  
Nylund N.-O., 2012, FUEL TECHNOLOGY ALTE
[34]   Automated vehicles and electrification of transport [J].
Offer, Gregory James .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (01) :26-30
[35]   Alternative fuel buses currently in use in China: Life-cycle fossil energy use, GHG emissions and policy recommendations [J].
Ou, Xunmin ;
Zhang, Xiliang ;
Chang, Shiyan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (01) :406-418
[36]   Route planning for electric buses: a case study in Oporto [J].
Perrotta, Deborah ;
Macedo, Jose Luis ;
Rossetti, Rosaldo J. F. ;
de Sousa, Jorge Freire ;
Kokkinogenis, Zafeiris ;
Ribeiro, Bernardo ;
Afonso, Joao L. .
TRANSPORTATION: CAN WE DO MORE WITH LESS RESOURCES? - 16TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION - PORTO 2013, 2014, 111 :1004-1014
[37]  
Pihlatie M, 2014, 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE CONFERENCE (IEVC)
[38]   Sustainable options for electric vehicle technologies [J].
Poullikkas, Andreas .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 41 :1277-1287
[39]   Efficiency, cost and life cycle CO2 optimization of fuel cell hybrid and plug-in hybrid urban buses [J].
Ribau, Joao P. ;
Silva, Carla M. ;
Sousa, Joao M. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 129 :320-335
[40]  
Robert E., 2014, WELL TO WHEELS ANAL