What hinders adoption of the electric bus in Canadian transit? Perspectives of transit providers

被引:66
作者
Mohamed, Moataz [1 ]
Ferguson, Mark [2 ]
Kanaroglou, Pavlos [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, McMaster Inst Transportat & Logist, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Sch Geog & Earth Sci, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
Electric bus; Grounded theory; Transit electrification; Operational feasibility; In-depth interviews; FUEL-CELL HYBRID; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; TOTAL-COST; VEHICLES; OPTIONS; IMPACT; PERCEPTION; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is increasing advocacy for the electrification of mobility choices to reduce transport related GHG emissions. Bus transit has been always considered a promising context for electric power train technologies. Current market shares, however, tell a different story with a very small share for electric powertrains. This study identifies factors that hinder the implementation of the electric bus in the public transit context as seen from the perspective of service providers. A grounded theory analysis of 11 in-depth interviews yielded 55 themes/concerns, allocated over four categories, that appear to govern the adoption of the electric bus in Canadian transit. Risk mitigation, operational capabilities, and cost reductions are identified as significantly influencing the perspective of service providers and consequently the potential of the electric bus to penetrate the marketplace. The findings also highlighted that: political support, Canadian-based operational data, standardization, and demonstration projects are essential components that would move transit providers towards electric powertrains. Overall, the study provides a detailed blueprint for a feasible path towards implementation of the electric bus technologies in the urban transit context.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 149
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Constructing Grounded Theory
[2]  
Barrieau P., 2015, 50 ANN CAN TRANSP RE
[3]   A comprehensive overview of hybrid electric vehicle: Powertrain configurations, powertrain control techniques and electronic control units [J].
Bayindir, Kamil Cagatay ;
Gozukucuk, Mehmet Ali ;
Teke, Ahmet .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (02) :1305-1313
[4]   Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study [J].
Beirao, Gabriela ;
Cabral, J. A. Sarsfield .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2007, 14 (06) :478-489
[5]  
Birks M., 2015, GROUNDED THEORY PRAC, V2nd
[6]   The state of the art of electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles [J].
Chan, C. C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2007, 95 (04) :704-718
[7]  
Conti M, 2015, LECT N MOBIL, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12244-1_9
[8]  
Creswell J. W., 2019, Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches
[9]  
CUTA, 2014, CAN TRANS FACT BOOK
[10]  
CUTA, 2011, FED PROV TERR PUBL T