Double Crown-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: 5-Year Follow-Up

被引:35
|
作者
Frisch, Eberhard [1 ,2 ]
Ziebolz, Dirk [3 ]
Ratka-Krueger, Petra [4 ]
Rinke, Sven [2 ]
机构
[1] Northern Hessia Implant Ctr, D-34369 Hofgeismar, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Dept Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Dept Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Periodontol Sect, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Freiburg, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, Periodontol Sect, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
dental implant; double crown; maxilla; overdenture; peri-implantitis; technical complication; PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; IMPLANT OVERDENTURES; PROSTHODONTIC MAINTENANCE; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES; TELESCOPIC CROWNS; PROSTHESES; RESTORATION; ATTACHMENTS; LONGEVITY; DENTURES;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12087
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere is a lack of data concerning implant-supported overdentures (IODs) retained by double crowns in the edentulous maxilla. PurposeTo perform a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes (survival/success rates) of maxillary overdentures retained on four implants via double crowns. Material and MethodsBetween 1993 and 2011, 28 patients with edentulous maxillae were restored with overdentures supported by four implants with a Morse taper connection (Ankylos, Dentsply Friadent, Mannheim, Germany) and double crowns according to the Marburg Double Crown (MDC) technique in a private practice. For retrospective evaluation of implant and prosthetic survival (in situ criterion) and success (event-free observational period), only patients attending a professional maintenance program were included (n=20). ResultsTwenty patients (13 female/ seven male, mean age: 63.457.18 years) with 80 implants met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 5.64 +/- 3.50 years. One implant was lost (cumulative survival rate: 98.75%). Eight implants (10.1%) in two patients (10%) showed peri-implantitis; both patients were active smokers (cumulative success rate: 88.75%). All dentures were still functional (prosthetic survival rate 100%) at the time of investigation. Technical maintenance procedures (e.g., abutment loosening, screw loosening, acrylic fracture or relining) were required at a rate of 0.222/patient-year. ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, we conclude that MDC-IODs are a promising treatment alternative for edentulous maxillae offering high implant and prosthesis survival rates>98% and a limited incidence of biological and technical complications after a mean observational period of >5 years.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 31
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unsplinted implants and teeth supporting maxillary removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: a retrospective study with >6years of follow-up
    Frisch, Eberhard
    Ratka-Krueger, Petra
    Wenz, Hans-Juergen
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (09) : 1091 - 1097
  • [22] Clinical Outcome of Double Crown-Retained Mandibular Removable Dentures Supported by a Combination of Residual Teeth and Strategic Implants
    Rinke, Sven
    Ziebolz, Dirk
    Ratka-Krueger, Petra
    Frisch, Eberhard
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (05): : 358 - 365
  • [23] Evaluation of Peri-Implant Parameters and Functional Outcome of Immediately Placed and Loaded Mandibular Overdentures: A 5-year Follow-up Study
    AlHelal, Abdulaziz A.
    Alzaid, Abdulaziz A.
    Almujel, Saad H.
    Alsaloum, Mohammed
    Alanazi, Khalid K.
    Althubaitiy, Ramzi O.
    Al-Aali, Khulud A.
    ORAL HEALTH & PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 22 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [24] Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures.
    Behr M.
    Hofmann E.
    Rosentritt M.
    Lang R.
    Handel G.
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2000, 4 (2) : 87 - 90
  • [25] Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible Supported by Implants and Retained by a Dolder Bar: A 5-Year Prospective Study
    Heschl, Alexander
    Payer, Michael
    Clar, Volker
    Stopper, Marlene
    Wegscheider, Walther
    Lorenzoni, Martin
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (04) : 589 - 599
  • [26] A 5-year follow-up study on the prosthetic rehabilitation of the elderly in Helsinki, Finland
    Nevalainen, MJ
    Närhi, TO
    Ainamo, A
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 31 (07) : 647 - 652
  • [27] Comparing bar and double-crown attachments in implant-retained prosthetic reconstruction: a follow-up investigation
    Eitner, Stephan
    Schlegel, Andreas
    Emeka, Nkenke
    Holst, Stefan
    Will, Joachim
    Hamel, Joerg
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (05) : 530 - 537
  • [28] Treatment Outcomes of Four-Implant-Retained Maxillary Palateless Overdenture: A 5-Year Observational Study
    Sude, Asha
    Schlam, Kimberly K.
    Tejeda, Hector Saenz de Viteri
    Reside, Glenn J.
    Sanders, Anne E.
    Felton, David A.
    De Kok, Ingeborg J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2025, 52 (02) : 181 - 189
  • [29] A 5-Year Randomized Trial to Compare 1 or 2 Implants for Implant Overdentures
    Bryant, S. R.
    Walton, J. N.
    MacEntee, M. I.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 94 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [30] Clinical outcomes of different implant types in mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a retrospective analysis with up to 20 years follow-up
    Betthauser, M.
    Schilter, R.
    Enkling, N.
    Suter, V. G. A.
    Abou-Ayash, S.
    Schimmel, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)