Double Crown-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: 5-Year Follow-Up

被引:35
|
作者
Frisch, Eberhard [1 ,2 ]
Ziebolz, Dirk [3 ]
Ratka-Krueger, Petra [4 ]
Rinke, Sven [2 ]
机构
[1] Northern Hessia Implant Ctr, D-34369 Hofgeismar, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Dept Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Dept Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Periodontol Sect, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Freiburg, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, Periodontol Sect, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
dental implant; double crown; maxilla; overdenture; peri-implantitis; technical complication; PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; IMPLANT OVERDENTURES; PROSTHODONTIC MAINTENANCE; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES; TELESCOPIC CROWNS; PROSTHESES; RESTORATION; ATTACHMENTS; LONGEVITY; DENTURES;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12087
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere is a lack of data concerning implant-supported overdentures (IODs) retained by double crowns in the edentulous maxilla. PurposeTo perform a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes (survival/success rates) of maxillary overdentures retained on four implants via double crowns. Material and MethodsBetween 1993 and 2011, 28 patients with edentulous maxillae were restored with overdentures supported by four implants with a Morse taper connection (Ankylos, Dentsply Friadent, Mannheim, Germany) and double crowns according to the Marburg Double Crown (MDC) technique in a private practice. For retrospective evaluation of implant and prosthetic survival (in situ criterion) and success (event-free observational period), only patients attending a professional maintenance program were included (n=20). ResultsTwenty patients (13 female/ seven male, mean age: 63.457.18 years) with 80 implants met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 5.64 +/- 3.50 years. One implant was lost (cumulative survival rate: 98.75%). Eight implants (10.1%) in two patients (10%) showed peri-implantitis; both patients were active smokers (cumulative success rate: 88.75%). All dentures were still functional (prosthetic survival rate 100%) at the time of investigation. Technical maintenance procedures (e.g., abutment loosening, screw loosening, acrylic fracture or relining) were required at a rate of 0.222/patient-year. ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, we conclude that MDC-IODs are a promising treatment alternative for edentulous maxillae offering high implant and prosthesis survival rates>98% and a limited incidence of biological and technical complications after a mean observational period of >5 years.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 31
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical outcome of double crown-retained implant overdentures with zirconia primary crowns
    Rinke, Sven
    Buergers, Ralf
    Ziebolz, Dirk
    Roediger, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2015, 7 (04) : 329 - 337
  • [2] Implant-Supported Telescopic Crown-Retained Overdentures for Oral Rehabilitation of Patients with Severe Bony Defects: A 5-Year Retrospective Study
    Zou, Duohong
    Wang, Feng
    Wu, Yiqun
    Huang, Wei
    Zhang, Chenping
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (04) : 937 - 944
  • [3] Maxillary implant overdentures retained with bars or solitary attachments: a 5-year randomised controlled trial
    Onclin, Pieter
    Boven, G. Carina
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (03) : 400 - 409
  • [4] Comparison of Ball and Telescopic Crown Attachments in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A 5-year Prospective Study
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Seemann, Rudolf
    Weinlaender, Michael
    Piehslinger, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (03) : 598 - 606
  • [5] STRAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF MARBURG DOUBLE CROWN-RETAINED IMPLANT OVERDENTURES COMPARED WITH BAR AND BALL-RETAINED IMPLANT OVERDENTURES, WITH AND WITHOUT A RIGID MAJOR CONNECTOR
    Kazokoglu, F. Sehnaz
    Akaltan, Funda
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 112 (06) : 1416 - 1424
  • [6] Long-Term Follow-up of Conical Crown-Retained Dentures Fabricated Using Different Technologies
    Pietruski, Jan K.
    Pietruska, Malgorzata D.
    Sajewicz, Eugeniusz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 32 (04) : 467 - 475
  • [7] Survival of Double-Crown-Retained Implant-and-Tooth-Supported Removable Partial Dentures: A ≥ 5-Year Clinical Follow-up Study
    Zierden, Karina
    Reich, Sarah Marie
    Vogler, Jonas Helmut Adrian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2024, 39 (04) : 557 - 566
  • [8] 7-Year Follow-Up of Maxillary Overdentures Supported by Mini-Dental Implants
    Van Doorne, Luc
    Demeulenaere, Laure
    Dejans, Marie
    De Bruyn, Hugo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (22)
  • [9] The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial
    Elsyad, M. A.
    Ashmawy, T. M.
    Faramawy, A. G.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [10] Long-term results of implant-supported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up
    Frisch, Eberhard
    Ziebolz, Dirk
    Rinke, Sven
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (12) : 1281 - 1287