A stage-gate integrated risk control system for LNG plant projects: Focusing on the design phase

被引:8
作者
Jang, Woosik [1 ]
Han, Seung Heon [1 ]
Park, Heedae [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Ames, IA USA
关键词
Risk management; LNG plant; Risk checklist; Coordination; Risk control system; Decision support; CONSTRUCTION; UNCERTAINTIES; DECISION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jngse.2014.12.018
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Since plant facilities including liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants pose accident risks, most risk studies have been focusing on public security risks and safety requirement. However, design and construction of LNG plants are also vulnerable to considerable schedule delay and cost increase due to its distinct characteristics such as the monopolized FEEDs technology, low-temperature and high-pressure equipment, and a large number of concurrent activities and participants. Hence, it is imperative to develop an efficient risk management tool which could support contractors' risk analysis and control in the design and construction phase. This study proposes a stage-gate integrated risk control framework focusing on the design phase of international LNG plant projects. An improved process to identify and analyze risks using the source-event, risk path, and quantification using probability-impact-significance of coordination concept are incorporated. A total of 83 risk factors of the design phase are identified and their quantification, prioritization, mitigation and monitoring methods are proposed along a state-gate framework. An illustrative case application is conducted to a real LNG plant project and its distinct benefits to manage and control risks of LNG projects are validated. Applicability and usability of the framework is also tested. The proposed framework is expected to function as effective tools for minimizing the risk of LNG projects and maximizing the management capacity of practitioners. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 446
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Hong H., 2011, 28 INT S AUT ROB CON, P1151
  • [32] Risk assessment in construction
    Jannadi, OA
    Almishari, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2003, 129 (05): : 492 - 500
  • [33] CONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT BY LINGUISTICS
    KANGARI, R
    RIGGS, LS
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1989, 36 (02) : 126 - 131
  • [34] Construction Risk Assessment Using Site Influence Factors
    Lee, Hyun-Soo
    Kim, Hyunsoo
    Park, Moonseo
    Teo, Evelyn Ai Lin
    Lee, Kwang-Pyo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 26 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [35] Risk-based siting considerations for LNG terminals - Comparative perspectives of United States & Europe
    Licari, Frank A.
    Weimer, C. David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2011, 24 (06) : 736 - 752
  • [36] Liebenberg A., 2003, RISK MANAG INSUR REV, V6, P37, DOI DOI 10.1111/1098-1616.00019
  • [37] Risk assessment in construction schedules
    Mulholland, B
    Christian, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 125 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [38] Fuzzy decision support system for risk analysis in e-commerce development
    Ngai, EWT
    Wat, FKT
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2005, 40 (02) : 235 - 255
  • [39] Measuring risk-associated activity's duration: A fuzzy set theory application
    Ock, Jong-Ho
    Han, Seung-Heon
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2010, 14 (05) : 663 - 671
  • [40] DELPHI METHOD - SUBSTANCE, CONTEXT - CRITIQUE AN AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
    PILL, J
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1971, 5 (01) : 57 - 71