Therapy preferences of patients with lung and colon cancer: a discrete choice experiment

被引:21
作者
Schmidt, Katharina [1 ]
Damm, Kathrin [1 ]
Vogel, Arndt [2 ]
Golpon, Heiko [3 ,4 ]
Manns, Michael P. [2 ]
Welte, Tobias [3 ,4 ]
von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias Graf [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Ctr Hlth Econ Res CHERH, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Endocrinol, Hannover, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Pneumol, Hannover, Germany
[4] German Ctr Lung Res DZL, Biomed Res Endstage & Obstruct Lung Dis Hannover, Hannover, Germany
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2017年 / 11卷
关键词
patient preferences; lung cancer; colorectal cancer; Germany; latent class model; multi-criteria decision making; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; HEALTH-CARE; CHEMOTHERAPY; SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN; QUANTITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S138863
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: There is increasing interest in studies that examine patient preferences to measure health-related outcomes. Understanding patients' preferences can improve the treatment process and is particularly relevant for oncology. In this study, we aimed to identify the subgroup-specific treatment preferences of German patients with lung cancer (LC) or colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Six discrete choice experiment (DCE) attributes were established on the basis of a systematic literature review and qualitative interviews. The DCE analyses comprised generalized linear mixed-effects model and latent class mixed logit model. Results: The study cohort comprised 310 patients (194 with LC, 108 with CRC, 8 with both types of cancer) with a median age of 63 (SD = 10.66) years. The generalized linear mixed-effects model showed a significant (P < 0.05) degree of association for all of the tested attributes. "Strongly increased life expectancy" was the attribute given the greatest weight by all patient groups. Using latent class mixed logit model analysis, we identified three classes of patients. Patients who were better informed tended to prefer a more balanced relationship between length and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than those who were less informed. Class 2 (LC patients with low HRQoL who had undergone surgery) gave a very strong weighting to increased length of life. We deduced from Class 3 patients that those with a relatively good life expectancy (CRC compared with LC) gave a greater weight to moderate effects on HRQoL than to a longer life. Conclusion: Overall survival was the most important attribute of therapy for patients with LC or CRC. Differences in treatment preferences between subgroups should be considered in regard to treatment and development of guidelines. Patients' preferences were not affected by sex or age, but were affected by the cancer type, HRQoL, surgery status, and the main source of information on the disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1647 / 1656
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] Quality of Life and Mortality of Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors in the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry
    Adams, Scott V.
    Ceballos, Rachel
    Newcomb, Polly A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [3] Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)
    Allemani, Claudia
    Weir, Hannah K.
    Carreira, Helena
    Harewood, Rhea
    Spika, Devon
    Wang, Xiao-Si
    Bannon, Finian
    Ahn, Jane V.
    Johnson, Christopher J.
    Bonaventure, Audrey
    Marcos-Gragera, Rafael
    Stiller, Charles
    Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar
    Chen, Wan-Qing
    Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J.
    Rachet, Bernard
    Soeberg, Matthew J.
    You, Hui
    Matsuda, Tomohiro
    Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena
    Storm, Hans
    Tucker, Thomas C.
    Coleman, Michel P.
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 385 (9972) : 977 - 1010
  • [4] Treatment-related experiences and preferences of patients with lung cancer: a qualitative analysis
    Aumann, Ines
    Kreis, Kristine
    Damm, Kathrin
    Golpon, Heiko
    Welte, Tobias
    von der Schulenburg, J. Matthias Graf
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2016, 19 (06) : 1226 - 1236
  • [5] Auspurg K, 2011, KOLNER Z SOZIOL SOZ, V63, P301, DOI 10.1007/s11577-011-0136-3
  • [6] Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Mohamed, Ateesha F.
    Finnern, Henrik W.
    Woehl, Anette
    Hauber, A. Brett
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2012, 77 (01) : 224 - 231
  • [7] The influence of patient beliefs and treatment satisfaction on the discontinuation of current first-line antiretroviral regimens
    Casado, J. L.
    Marin, A.
    Romero, V.
    Banon, S.
    Moreno, A.
    Perez-Elias, M. J.
    Moreno, S.
    Rodriguez-Sagrado, M. A.
    [J]. HIV MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (01) : 46 - 55
  • [8] Patient attitudes towards chemotherapy as assessed by patient versus physician: A prospective observational study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Chu, Da-Tong
    Kim, Sang-We
    Kuo, Han-Pin
    Ozacar, Rifat
    Salajka, Frantisek
    Krishnamurthy, S.
    Damyanov, Danail
    Altug, Sedat
    Reece, William H. H.
    Wang, Li
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2007, 56 (03) : 433 - 443
  • [9] Chue Pierre, 2006, J Psychopharmacol, V20, P38, DOI 10.1177/1359786806071246
  • [10] Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations
    Coast, Joanna
    Al-Janabi, Hareth
    Sutton, Eileen J.
    Horrocks, Susan A.
    Vosper, A. Jane
    Swancutt, Dawn R.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (06) : 730 - 741