Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Nasopharynx Cancer: 2-year Outcomes from a Single Institution

被引:12
|
作者
Williams, Vonetta M. [1 ]
Parvathaneni, Upendra [1 ]
Laramore, George E. [1 ]
Aljabab, Saif [2 ]
Wong, Tony P. [3 ]
Liao, Jay J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Roswell Park Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Proton Therapy Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
proton therapy; nasopharyngeal cancer; head and neck cancer; PHASE-II TRIAL; RADIATION-THERAPY; PARANASAL SINUS; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; PATTERNS; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; RELAPSE; HEAD;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-20-00057.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Advances in radiotherapy have improved tumor control and reduced toxicity in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Local failure remains a problem for some patients with advanced primary tumors, and toxicities are significant given the large treatment volume and tumor proximity to critical structures, even with modern photon-based radiotherapy. Proton therapy has unique dosimetric advantages, and recent technological advances now allow delivery of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio in NPC. We report our 2-year clinical outcomes with IMPT for NPC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed treatment records of patients with NPC treated with IMPT at our center. Demographics, dosimetry, tumor response, local regional control (LRC), distant metastasis, overall survival, and acute and late toxicity outcomes were reviewed. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Results: Twenty-six patients were treated from 2015 to 2020. Median age was 48 years (range, 19-73 years), 62% (n = 16) had T3-T4 disease, 92% (n = 24) were node positive, 92% (n = 24) had stage III-IV disease, and 69% (n = 18) had positive results for Epstein-Barr virus. Dose-painted pencil-beam IMPT was used. Most patients (85%; 22 of 26) were treated with 70 Gy(RBE) in 33 fractions once daily; 4 (15%) underwent hyperfractionated accelerated treatment twice daily. All received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy; 7 (27%) also received induction chemotherapy. All patients (100%) completed the planned radiotherapy, and no acute or late grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. At median follow-up of 25 months (range, 4-60), there were 2 local regional failures (8%) and 3 distant metastases (12%). The Kaplan-Meier 2-year LRC, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival were 92%, 87%, and 85% respectively. Conclusion: IMPT is feasible in locally advanced NPC with early outcomes demonstrating excellent LRC and favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical use of IMPT for NPC.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 40
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy for anal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single institution
    Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra
    Zerella, Maria Alessia
    Bergamaschi, Luca
    Ferrari, Annamaria
    Arculeo, Simona
    Bagnardi, Vincenzo
    Frassoni, Samuele
    Petz, Wanda
    Fodor, Cristiana
    Emiro, Francesca
    Cattani, Federica
    Leonardi, Maria Cristina
    Zampino, Maria Giulia
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [22] Primary and adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy in oropharyngeal carcinoma patients from a single institution
    Hauswald, Henrik
    Petrow, Eugen
    Roeder, Falk
    Debus, Juergen
    Zwicker, Felix
    Huber, Peter E.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (01) : 375 - 382
  • [23] Definitive Intensity-Modulated Chemoradiation for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Outcomes and Toxicity of 428 Patients Treated at a Single Institution
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Morris, Van K.
    Johnson, Benny
    Eng, Cathy
    Ludmir, Ethan B.
    Das, Prajnan
    Minsky, Bruce D.
    Taniguchi, Cullen
    Smith, Grace L.
    Koay, Eugene J.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Delclos, Marc E.
    Skibber, John M.
    Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.
    You, Y. Nancy
    Bednarski, Brian K.
    Tillman, Mathew M.
    Chang, George J.
    Jennings, Kristofer
    Messick, Craig A.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [24] Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: Passive Scattering versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
    Borowicz, Dorota Maria
    Shipulin, Konstantin N.
    Mytsin, Gennady V.
    Skrobala, Agnieszka
    Milecki, Piotr
    Gayevsky, Victor N.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [25] Case-Matched Outcomes of Proton Beam and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Bao, Alicia
    Barsky, Andrew R.
    Both, Stefan
    Christodouleas, John P.
    Deville Jr, Curtiland
    Tochner, Zelig A.
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Maxwell, Russell
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2023,
  • [26] CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY WITH INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE LARYNX AND OROPHARYNX: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-INSTITUTION ANALYSIS
    Saba, Nabil F.
    Edelman, Scott
    Tighiouart, Mourad
    Gaultney, Jennifer
    Davis, Lawrence W.
    Khuri, Fadlo R.
    Chen, Amy
    Grist, William
    Shin, Dong M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2009, 31 (11): : 1447 - 1455
  • [27] Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Youssef, Irini
    Yoon, Jennifer
    Mohamed, Nader
    Zakeri, Kaveh
    Press, Robert H.
    Chen, Linda
    Gelblum, Daphna Y.
    McBride, Sean M.
    Tsai, Chiaojung Jillian
    Riaz, Nadeem
    Yu, Yao
    Cohen, Marc A.
    Dunn, Lara Ann
    Ho, Alan L.
    Wong, Richard J.
    Michel, Loren S.
    Boyle, Jay O.
    Singh, Bhuvanesh
    Kriplani, Anuja
    Ganly, Ian
    Sherman, Eric J.
    Pfister, David G.
    Fetten, James
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (11) : E2241538
  • [28] Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - A case matched analysis
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Garden, Adam S.
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Morrison, William H.
    Hernandez, Mike
    Crutison, Joseph
    Lee, Jack J.
    Ye, Rong
    Fuller, C. David
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    Hutcheson, Kate A.
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Thaker, Nikhil G.
    Sturgis, Erich M.
    Kies, Merrill S.
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Mohan, Radhe
    Frank, Steven J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [29] Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Photon Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: First Comparative Results of Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Sio, Terence T.
    Lin, Huei-Kai
    Shi, Qiuling
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Lee, J. Jack
    Hernandez, Mike
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Thaker, Nikhil G.
    Phan, Jack
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Garden, Adam S.
    Morrison, William H.
    Fuller, C. David
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Mohan, Radhe
    Wang, Xin Shelley
    Frank, Steven J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (04): : 1107 - 1114
  • [30] Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy at Different Time Points
    Liao, Kuan-Cho
    Huang, Yu-Jie
    Tsai, Wen-Ling
    Lee, Chien-Hung
    Fang, Fu-Min
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (06)