A value-justice model of knowledge integration in wikis: The moderating role of knowledge equivocality

被引:37
作者
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Sun, Yongqiang [1 ]
Shen, Xiao-Liang [2 ]
Zhang, Xi [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Econ & Management Sch, Mailbox 0828, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Wikis; Collaborative editing; Knowledge quality; Knowledge integration; Perceived value; Perceived justice; Knowledge equivocality; PERCEIVED PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES; INFORMATION DISCLOSURE; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; WIKIPEDIA CONTENT; MEDIATING ROLE; QUALITY; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.006
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The sustainability of Wikis heavily relies on the quality of knowledge that is collaboratively integrated by volunteers. Although the factors influencing one specific knowledge contribution or knowledge-sharing behavior (e.g., adding) have been widely examined, the research on the factors that affect another type of knowledge contribution, i.e., knowledge integration, is still rare. Considering the collaborative nature of knowledge integration, beyond the value-centric logic of knowledge contribution, we propose a value-justice model of knowledge integration. We further identify the boundary conditions under which the proposed value-justice model works by investigating the moderating role of knowledge equivocality. A survey was conducted in a well-known Wiki-based website in China, namely, Baidu Baike, to test the research model and hypotheses. Our results show that both perceived justice and perceived value influence knowledge integration, which in turn affects knowledge quality, and knowledge equivocality strengthens the relationship between perceived justice / perceived value and knowledge integration and the relationship between knowledge integration and knowledge quality. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 75
页数:12
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Açikgöz A, 2017, INT J INNOV MANAG, V21, DOI 10.1142/S1363919617500396
  • [2] TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY
    ADAMS, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 67 (05) : 422 - &
  • [3] Akram T., 2017, Journal of Innovation Knowledge, V2, P134, DOI [10.1016/j.jik.2016.09.002, DOI 10.1016/J.JIK.2016.09.002]
  • [4] Stay on the Wikipedia task: When task-related disagreements slip into personal and procedural conflicts
    Arazy, Ofer
    Yeo, Lisa
    Nov, Oded
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (08): : 1634 - 1648
  • [5] Information Quality in Wikipedia: The Effects of Group Composition and Task Conflict
    Arazy, Ofer
    Nov, Oded
    Patterson, Raymond
    Yeo, Lisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 27 (04) : 71 - 98
  • [6] WORK AND OR FUN - MEASURING HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN SHOPPING VALUE
    BABIN, BJ
    DARDEN, WR
    GRIFFIN, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 20 (04) : 644 - 656
  • [7] Beck R., 2015, Journal of Business Economics, V85, P389, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11573-014-0760-2
  • [8] Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate
    Bock, GW
    Zmud, RW
    Kim, YG
    Lee, JN
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2005, 29 (01) : 87 - 111
  • [9] The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations
    Bogers, Marcel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 14 (01) : 93 - +
  • [10] If You Fight With Me, I'll Get Mad! A Social Model of Entrepreneurial Affect
    Breugst, Nicola
    Shepherd, Dean A.
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 41 (03) : 379 - 418