Comparative efficacy and acceptability of atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, bupropion and methylphenidate in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis with focus on bupropion

被引:54
|
作者
Stuhec, Matej [1 ]
Munda, Barbara [2 ]
Svab, Vesna [3 ]
Locatelli, Igor [2 ]
机构
[1] Ormoz Psychiat Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Ormoz 2270, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Chair Social Pharm, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Ljubljana 1104, Slovenia
关键词
Bupropion; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Meta-analysis; Efficacy; Acceptability; Child and adolescent psychiatry; ONCE-DAILY ATOMOXETINE; PROOF-OF-CONCEPT; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER; DOUBLE-BLIND; OROS METHYLPHENIDATE; A-DAY; PLACEBO; DIMESYLATE; TRIAL; MEDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: There is a lack of comparative effectiveness research among attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) drugs in terms of efficacy and acceptability, where bupropion is compared with atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate. The main aim of this work was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of these drugs in children and adolescents using a metaanalysis. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled, noncrossover studies of ADHD. PubMecl/Medline and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Comparative drug efficacy to placebo was calculated based on the standardized mean difference (SMD), while the comparative drug acceptability (all cause discontinuation) to placebo was estimated on the odds ratio (OR). Results: In total 28 trials were included in the meta-analysis. Efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms compared to placebo was small for bupropion (SMD= -0.32, 95% CI -0.69, 0.05), while modest efficacy was shown for atomoxetine (SfV1D= -0.68, 95% Cl; -0.76, -0.59) and methylphenidate (SMD= -0.75, 95% Cl; -0.98, -0.52) and high efficacy was observed for lisdexamfetamine (SMD= -1.28, 95%, Cl; -1.84, -0.71). Compared to placebo treatment discontinuation was statistically significantly lower for methylphenidate (OR =0.35, 95% Cl, 0.24, 0.52), while it was not significantly different for atomoxetine (OR =0.91, 95% CI; 0.66, 1.24), lisdexamfetamine (OR =0.60, 95% CI, 0.22, 1.65), and bupropion (OR=1.64, 95% Cl; 0.5, 5.43). Limitations: The heterogeneity was high, except in atomoxetine trials. The crossover studies were excluded. The effect sizes at specific time points were not computed. Studies with comorbid conditions, except those reporting on oppositional defiant disorder, were also excluded. All studies involving MPH were combined. Conclusions: The results suggest that lisclexamfetamine has the best benefit risk balance and has promising potential for treating children and adolescents with ADHD. More research is needed for a better clinical evaluation of bupropion. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 159
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Methylphenidate for Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder A Meta-Regression Analysis
    Castells, Xavier
    Antoni Ramos-Quiroga, Josep
    Rigau, David
    Bosch, Rosa
    Nogueira, Mariana
    Vidal, Xavier
    Casas, Miguel
    CNS DRUGS, 2011, 25 (02) : 157 - 169
  • [42] Atomoxetine Treatment in Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Wietecha, Linda A.
    Williams, David W.
    Herbert, Michael
    Melmed, Raun D.
    Greenbaum, Michael
    Schuh, Kory
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 (06) : 719 - 730
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Recent Methylphenidate Use
    Rakesh Jain
    Thomas Babcock
    Teodor Burtea
    Bryan Dirks
    Ben Adeyi
    Brian Scheckner
    Robert Lasser
    John Renna
    Don Duncan
    Advances in Therapy, 2013, 30 : 472 - 486
  • [44] Comparative efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine in child and adolescent ADHD: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Maneeton, Benchalak
    Maneeton, Narong
    Likhitsathian, Surinporn
    Suttajit, Sirijit
    Narkpongphun, Assawin
    Srisurapanont, Manit
    Woottiluk, Pakapan
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2015, 9 : 1927 - 1936
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine in Preschool Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Childress, Ann C.
    Lloyd, Eric
    Jacobsen, Leslie
    Gunawardhana, Lhanoo
    Johnson, Steven A., Jr.
    Findling, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 61 (12) : 1423 - 1434
  • [46] Does Methylphenidate Work in Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?
    Ribeiro, Johanne Pereira
    Arthur, Emma Jasmine
    Gluud, Christian
    Simonsen, Erik
    Storebo, Ole Jakob
    PEDIATRIC REPORTS, 2021, 13 (03): : 434 - 443
  • [47] Cardiovascular Effects of Methylphenidate, Amphetamines and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Stiefel, Gary
    Besag, Frank M. C.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 33 (10) : 821 - 842
  • [48] Switch in Therapy from Methylphenidate to Atomoxetine in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: An Analysis of Patient Records
    Warrer, Pernille
    Thomsen, Per Hove
    Dalsgaard, Soren
    Hansen, Ebba Holme
    Aagaard, Lise
    Kildemoes, Helle Wallach
    Rasmussen, Henrik Berg
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) : 354 - 361
  • [49] Treatment outcomes after methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate or atomoxetine
    Joseph, Alain
    Cloutier, Martin
    Guerin, Annie
    Nitulescu, Roy
    Sikirica, Vanja
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2016, 10 : 391 - 405
  • [50] Review of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Najib, Jadwiga
    Didenko, Ekaterina
    Meleshkina, Daria
    Yusupov, Kamila
    Maw, Kateryna
    Ramnarain, Justin
    Tabassum, Maliha
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2020, 36 (10) : 1717 - 1735