Comparative efficacy and acceptability of atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, bupropion and methylphenidate in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis with focus on bupropion

被引:54
|
作者
Stuhec, Matej [1 ]
Munda, Barbara [2 ]
Svab, Vesna [3 ]
Locatelli, Igor [2 ]
机构
[1] Ormoz Psychiat Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Ormoz 2270, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Chair Social Pharm, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Ljubljana 1104, Slovenia
关键词
Bupropion; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Meta-analysis; Efficacy; Acceptability; Child and adolescent psychiatry; ONCE-DAILY ATOMOXETINE; PROOF-OF-CONCEPT; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER; DOUBLE-BLIND; OROS METHYLPHENIDATE; A-DAY; PLACEBO; DIMESYLATE; TRIAL; MEDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: There is a lack of comparative effectiveness research among attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) drugs in terms of efficacy and acceptability, where bupropion is compared with atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate. The main aim of this work was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of these drugs in children and adolescents using a metaanalysis. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled, noncrossover studies of ADHD. PubMecl/Medline and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Comparative drug efficacy to placebo was calculated based on the standardized mean difference (SMD), while the comparative drug acceptability (all cause discontinuation) to placebo was estimated on the odds ratio (OR). Results: In total 28 trials were included in the meta-analysis. Efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms compared to placebo was small for bupropion (SMD= -0.32, 95% CI -0.69, 0.05), while modest efficacy was shown for atomoxetine (SfV1D= -0.68, 95% Cl; -0.76, -0.59) and methylphenidate (SMD= -0.75, 95% Cl; -0.98, -0.52) and high efficacy was observed for lisdexamfetamine (SMD= -1.28, 95%, Cl; -1.84, -0.71). Compared to placebo treatment discontinuation was statistically significantly lower for methylphenidate (OR =0.35, 95% Cl, 0.24, 0.52), while it was not significantly different for atomoxetine (OR =0.91, 95% CI; 0.66, 1.24), lisdexamfetamine (OR =0.60, 95% CI, 0.22, 1.65), and bupropion (OR=1.64, 95% Cl; 0.5, 5.43). Limitations: The heterogeneity was high, except in atomoxetine trials. The crossover studies were excluded. The effect sizes at specific time points were not computed. Studies with comorbid conditions, except those reporting on oppositional defiant disorder, were also excluded. All studies involving MPH were combined. Conclusions: The results suggest that lisclexamfetamine has the best benefit risk balance and has promising potential for treating children and adolescents with ADHD. More research is needed for a better clinical evaluation of bupropion. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 159
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meta-Analysis: Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children With Comorbid Tic Disorders
    Bloch, Michael H.
    Panza, Kaitlyn E.
    Landeros-Weisenberger, Angeli
    Leckman, James F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 48 (09) : 884 - 893
  • [32] Spotlight on Atomoxetine in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents
    Garnock-Jones, Karly P.
    Keating, Gillian M.
    CNS DRUGS, 2010, 24 (01) : 85 - 88
  • [33] Therapeutic efficacy of probiotics for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: meta-analysis
    Liang, Shun-Chin
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    Chang, Chih-Hua
    Cheng, Yu-Shian
    Tzang, Ruu-Fen
    Chiu, Hsien-Jane
    Wang, Ming Yu
    Cheng, Ying-Chih
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [34] Population pharmacodynamic modeling of various extended-release formulations of methylphenidate in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via meta-analysis
    Kimko, Holly
    Gibiansky, Ekaterina
    Gibiansky, Leonid
    Starr, H. Lynn
    Berwaerts, Joris
    Massarella, Joseph
    Wiegand, Frank
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2012, 39 (02) : 161 - 176
  • [35] Comparative short term efficacy and tolerability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Jasmin Garg
    Priti Arun
    B. S. Chavan
    Indian Pediatrics, 2014, 51 : 550 - 554
  • [36] Lisdexamfetamine in the treatment of adolescents and children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Najib, Jadwiga
    ADOLESCENT HEALTH MEDICINE AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 3 : 51 - 66
  • [37] The efficacy of atomoxetine in treating adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Ravishankar, Vinutha
    Chowdappa, Suresh Vedaveni
    Benegal, Vivek
    Muralidharan, Kesavan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 24 : 53 - 58
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents-meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis
    Cheng, Jackie Y. W.
    Chen, Ronald Y. L.
    Ko, John S. N.
    Ng, Emil M. L.
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 194 (02) : 197 - 209
  • [39] Atomoxetine:: a new treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents
    Purper-Ouakil, D
    Fourneret, P
    Wohl, M
    Rénéric, JP
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2005, 31 (03): : 337 - 348
  • [40] A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder: long-term safety and efficacy
    Schein, Jeff
    Cloutier, Martin
    Gauthier-Loiselle, Marjolaine
    Catillon, Maryaline
    Xu, Chunyi
    Qu, Alice
    Lee, Francesca
    Childress, Ann
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (09)