Comparative efficacy and acceptability of atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, bupropion and methylphenidate in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis with focus on bupropion

被引:54
|
作者
Stuhec, Matej [1 ]
Munda, Barbara [2 ]
Svab, Vesna [3 ]
Locatelli, Igor [2 ]
机构
[1] Ormoz Psychiat Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Ormoz 2270, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Chair Social Pharm, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Ljubljana 1104, Slovenia
关键词
Bupropion; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Meta-analysis; Efficacy; Acceptability; Child and adolescent psychiatry; ONCE-DAILY ATOMOXETINE; PROOF-OF-CONCEPT; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER; DOUBLE-BLIND; OROS METHYLPHENIDATE; A-DAY; PLACEBO; DIMESYLATE; TRIAL; MEDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: There is a lack of comparative effectiveness research among attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) drugs in terms of efficacy and acceptability, where bupropion is compared with atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate. The main aim of this work was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of these drugs in children and adolescents using a metaanalysis. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled, noncrossover studies of ADHD. PubMecl/Medline and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Comparative drug efficacy to placebo was calculated based on the standardized mean difference (SMD), while the comparative drug acceptability (all cause discontinuation) to placebo was estimated on the odds ratio (OR). Results: In total 28 trials were included in the meta-analysis. Efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms compared to placebo was small for bupropion (SMD= -0.32, 95% CI -0.69, 0.05), while modest efficacy was shown for atomoxetine (SfV1D= -0.68, 95% Cl; -0.76, -0.59) and methylphenidate (SMD= -0.75, 95% Cl; -0.98, -0.52) and high efficacy was observed for lisdexamfetamine (SMD= -1.28, 95%, Cl; -1.84, -0.71). Compared to placebo treatment discontinuation was statistically significantly lower for methylphenidate (OR =0.35, 95% Cl, 0.24, 0.52), while it was not significantly different for atomoxetine (OR =0.91, 95% CI; 0.66, 1.24), lisdexamfetamine (OR =0.60, 95% CI, 0.22, 1.65), and bupropion (OR=1.64, 95% Cl; 0.5, 5.43). Limitations: The heterogeneity was high, except in atomoxetine trials. The crossover studies were excluded. The effect sizes at specific time points were not computed. Studies with comorbid conditions, except those reporting on oppositional defiant disorder, were also excluded. All studies involving MPH were combined. Conclusions: The results suggest that lisclexamfetamine has the best benefit risk balance and has promising potential for treating children and adolescents with ADHD. More research is needed for a better clinical evaluation of bupropion. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 159
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Systematic Review of the Use of Bupropion for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents
    Ng, Qin Xiang
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 112 - 116
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Kohn, Michael R.
    Tsang, Tracey W.
    Clarke, Simon D.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-PEDIATRICS, 2012, 6 : 95 - 162
  • [23] Neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis
    Pievsky, Michelle A.
    McGrath, Robert E.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2018, 90 : 447 - 455
  • [24] Atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a review
    Hammerness, Paul
    McCarthy, Katherine
    Mancuso, Elizabeth
    Gendron, Cassandra
    Geller, Daniel
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2009, 5 : 215 - 226
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis
    Padilha, Sarah C. O. S.
    Virtuoso, Suzane
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Borba, Helena H. L.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 27 (10) : 1335 - 1345
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Recent Methylphenidate Use
    Jain, Rakesh
    Babcock, Thomas
    Burtea, Teodor
    Dirks, Bryan
    Adeyi, Ben
    Scheckner, Brian
    Lasser, Robert
    Renna, John
    Duncan, Don
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2013, 30 (05) : 472 - 486
  • [27] Comparative Efficacy of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Youths with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Shih, Hsien-Hsueh
    Shang, Chi-Yung
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 9 - 19
  • [28] Factors Associated with Atomoxetine Efficacy for Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents
    Scott, Nakia Gray
    Ripperger-Suhler, Jane
    Rajab, M. Hasan
    Kjar, Dean
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [29] Meta-analysis of the efficacy of digital therapies in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
    He, Fan
    Qi, Yanjie
    Zhou, Yuanyue
    Cao, Aihua
    Yue, Xin
    Fang, Shuanfeng
    Zheng, Yi
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
  • [30] An Open-Label, Randomized Trial of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine Treatment in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Shang, Chi-Yung
    Pan, Yi-Lei
    Lin, Hsiang-Yuan
    Huang, Lin-Wan
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) : 566 - 573