Mediating processes of two communication interventions for breast cancer patients

被引:30
作者
Hawkins, Robert P. [1 ]
Pingree, Suzanne [1 ]
Shaw, Bret [1 ]
Serlin, Ronald C. [1 ]
Swoboda, Chris [1 ]
Han, Jeong-Yeob [2 ]
Carmack, Cindy L. [3 ]
Salner, Andrew [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Hartford Hosp, Hartford, CT 06115 USA
关键词
e-Health; Internet; Patient mentoring; Self-Determination Theory; Interactive cancer communication systems; Quality of life; Breast cancer; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; INTERNET; THERAPY; IMPACT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.021
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Test whether three mediating processes of Self-Determination Theory are involved in intervention effects on quality of life for breast cancer patients. Methods: A randomized clinical trial recruited newly diagnosed breast cancer patients for 6 months of (1) Internet training and access, (2) access to an integrated eHealth system for breast cancer (CHESS), (3) a series of phone conversations with a Human Cancer Information Mentor, or (4) both (2) and (3). Results: This paper reports results after the initial 6 weeks of intervention, at which point patients in the combined condition had higher quality of life scores than those in the other three conditions. All three Self-Determination Theory constructs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) mediated that effect as hypothesized. In addition, the single-intervention groups were superior to the Internet-only group on relatedness, though perhaps this was too soon for that to carry through to quality of life as well. Conclusions: The SOT constructs do mediate these interventions' effects. Practice implications: Intervention design can profitably focus on enhancing autonomy, competence and relatedness. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:S48 / S53
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2007
[2]   Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics [J].
Bernhardt, JM ;
Lariscy, RAW ;
Parrott, RL ;
Silk, KJ ;
Felter, EM .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2002, 7 (04) :325-340
[3]   Exploring e-health usage and interest among cancer information service users: The need for personalized interactions and multiple channels remains [J].
Bright, MA ;
Fleisher, L ;
Thomsen, C ;
Morra, ME ;
Marcus, A ;
Gehring, W .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2005, 10 :35-52
[4]   General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) [J].
Brucker, PS ;
Yost, K ;
Cashy, J ;
Webster, K ;
Cella, D .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2005, 28 (02) :192-211
[5]   The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses [J].
Butler, AC ;
Chapman, JE ;
Forman, EM ;
Beck, AT .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 26 (01) :17-31
[6]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[7]  
Cohen J., 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, VThird ed., DOI 10.4324/9780203774441
[8]   Architecture for knowledge-based and federated search of online clinical evidence [J].
Coiera, E ;
Walther, M ;
Nguyen, K ;
Lovell, NH .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (05) :17-29
[9]  
Deci E. L., 1985, INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, DOI [DOI 10.2307/2070638, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7]
[10]   The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes [J].
Eysenbach, G .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2003, 53 (06) :356-371