Decomposing crop model uncertainty: A systematic review

被引:46
作者
Chapagain, Ranju [1 ]
Remenyi, Tomas A. [2 ]
Harris, Rebecca M. B. [2 ]
Mohammed, Caroline L. [1 ]
Huth, Neil [3 ]
Wallach, Daniel [4 ]
Rezaei, Ehsan Eyshi [5 ]
Ojeda, Jonathan J. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Geog & Spatial Sci, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[3] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[4] French Natl Inst Agr Food & Environm INRAE, F-75338 Paris, France
[5] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Muncheberg, Germany
[6] Regrow Ag, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Crop model; Input uncertainty; Structural uncertainty; Parameter uncertainty; Grain yield; Mechanistic modelling; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACT; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; ADAPTATION STRATEGIES; MAIZE-YIELD; QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; NITROGEN MANAGEMENT; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY; RIVER-BASIN; TRADE-OFFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108448
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Crop models are essential tools for analysing the effects of climate variability, change on crop growth and development and the potential impact of adaptation strategies. Despite their increasing usage, crop model estimations have implicit uncertainties which are difficult to classify and quantify. Failure to address these uncertainties may result in poor advice to policymakers and stakeholders for the development of adaptation strategies. Since the 1990s, the number of crop model uncertainty assessments that consider different sources of model uncertainty (model structure, model parameters and model inputs such as climate, soil, and crop management practices) has increased significantly. We present the outcomes of a systematic review focused on uncertainty assessments of crop model outputs (mainly grain yield) and crop model uncertainty decomposition. We reviewed 277 articles from 1991 to 2019 which included studies conducted in 82 countries (460 locations) across all continents. 57% of the articles have been published between 2015 and 2019. 52% of the studies focus on input uncertainty assessments with climate change projections as the most frequently considered source of input uncertainty. Only 28% and 20% of the studies, respectively, dealt with uncertainties related to model parameters and model structure. The latter was mainly quantified using multi-model ensembles. Over half the studies were carried out in European and Asian countries, 34% and 23%, respectively. Most articles estimated model uncertainty focusing on the grain yield of major cereal crops (wheat > maize > rice) using the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) model. Sensitivity analysis was the most used technique to quantify the contribution of different sources of uncertainty although the range of approaches for uncertainty quantification was wide. There is a need for standard procedures to estimate crop model uncertainty and evaluate estimates. We discuss the challenges of quantifying the components of uncertainty within crop models and identify research needs to better understand sources of uncertainty and thus improve the accuracy of crop models.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [1] Effects of modelling detail on simulated potential crop yields under a wide range of climatic conditions
    Adam, M.
    Van Bussel, L. G. J.
    Leffelaar, P. A.
    Van Keulen, H.
    Ewert, F.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (01) : 131 - 143
  • [2] UNCERTAINTIES IN CROP, SOIL AND WEATHER INPUTS USED IN GROWTH-MODELS - IMPLICATIONS FOR SIMULATED OUTPUTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
    AGGARWAL, PK
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1995, 48 (03) : 361 - 384
  • [3] Assessment of Climate Change and Atmospheric CO2 Impact on Winter Wheat in the Pacific Northwest Using a Multimodel Ensemble
    Ahmed, Mukhtar
    Stockle, Claudio O.
    Nelson, Roger
    Higgins, Stewart
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 5
  • [4] Assessment of maize growth and yield using crop models under present and future climate in southwestern Ethiopia
    Araya, A.
    Hoogenboom, G.
    Luedeling, E.
    Hadgu, Kiros M.
    Kisekka, Isaya
    Martorano, Lucieta G.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2015, 214 : 252 - 265
  • [5] Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making
    Ascough, J. C., II
    Maier, H. R.
    Ravalico, J. K.
    Strudley, M. W.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 219 (3-4) : 383 - 399
  • [6] Asseng S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P827, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1916, 10.1038/nclimate1916]
  • [7] Begg S.H., 2014, EC EVAL S, P19, DOI DOI 10.2118/169850-MS
  • [8] Validation of biophysical models: issues and methodologies. A review
    Bellocchi, Gianni
    Rivington, Mike
    Donatelli, Marcello
    Matthews, Keith
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 30 (01) : 109 - 130
  • [9] Assessing the impact of changes in land-use intensity and climate on simulated trade-offs between crop yield and nitrogen leaching
    Blanke, Jan Hendrik
    Olin, Stefan
    Sturck, Julia
    Sahlin, Ullrika
    Lindeskog, Mats
    Helming, John
    Lehsten, Veiko
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 239 : 385 - 398
  • [10] Evaluation of climate change impacts and adaptation strategies on rainfed rice production in Songkhram River Basin, Thailand
    Boonwichai, Siriwat
    Shrestha, Sangam
    Babel, Mukand S.
    Weesakul, Sutat
    Datta, Avishek
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 652 : 189 - 201