Scientific productivity and patenting at the laboratory level: an analysis of Brazilian public research laboratories

被引:3
作者
Dias, Alexandre Aparecido [1 ]
Kannebley Junior, Sergio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Fac Econ, 6627 Presidente Antonio Carlos Av, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Econ Adm & Accounting Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Scientific productivity; patenting; knowledge production function; research laboratory; economics of science; COLLECTIVE DETERMINANTS; EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES; RESEARCH ORGANIZATION; ACADEMIC SCIENTISTS; SUPPORT; COOPERATION; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/10438599.2019.1703347
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, we investigated how different styles of research organisation of laboratories were related to scientific performance and patenting. From a Brazilian national database that included 1,412 laboratories, we defined a typology with five categories of laboratories. The categories were defined based on team composition-represented by the participation of permanent researchers, postgraduate students, and technicians-and by the scope of activities conducted in the laboratories. Adopting the concept of knowledge production functions, we estimated the productivity of the different categories of laboratories and the elasticities of capital and labour available for scientific production and patenting at the laboratory level. We found that medium-scale university laboratories focused on teaching and research reported higher scientific productivity, whereas laboratories focused on providing technological services and small-scale laboratories, which were less common in universities, filed for more patents. The estimation of knowledge production functions showed that scientific production was determined both by capital and by the labour of permanent and non-permanent researchers. Patenting was mainly determined by the labour factor. We also found complementarity between scientific production and patenting as well as constant returns to scale for scientific production at the laboratory level.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 355
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The Production of Academic Technological Knowledge: an Exploration at the Research Group Level [J].
Acosta, Manuel ;
Coronado, Daniel ;
Leon, Ma Dolores ;
Moreno, Pedro Jesus .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2020, 11 (03) :1003-1025
[2]   Does technological diversification spur university patenting? [J].
Acosta, Manuel ;
Coronado, Daniel ;
Angeles Martinez, M. .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2018, 43 (01) :96-119
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Multiple Correspondence Analysis
[4]   University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises [J].
Arvanitis, Spyros ;
Kubli, Ursina ;
Woerter, Martin .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (10) :1865-1883
[5]  
Azagra-Caro J.M., 2006, The Journal of Technology Transfer, V31, P257, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10961-005-6110-3
[6]   The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? [J].
Azoulay, Pierre ;
Ding, Waverly ;
Stuart, Toby .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2007, 63 (04) :599-623
[7]   Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities [J].
Bentley, Peter James .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 102 (01) :865-883
[8]   The determinants of research performance in European universities: a large scale multilevel analysis [J].
Bonaccorsi, Andrea ;
Secondi, Luca .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 112 (03) :1147-1178
[9]   Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals [J].
Braun, T ;
Glänzel, W ;
Schubert, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (03) :499-510
[10]   THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA [J].
Breschi, S. ;
Lissoni, F. ;
Montobbio, F. .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 16 (02) :101-118