'Reserve effect': An opportunity to mitigate human-wild boar conflicts

被引:16
作者
Colomer, Joana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rosell, Carme [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez-Teijeiro, Jose Domingo [2 ,3 ]
Massei, Giovanna [4 ]
机构
[1] Minuartia, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Fac Biol, Dept Evolutionary Biol Ecol & Environm Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Inst Recerca Biodiversitat, IRBio, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Natl Wildlife Management Ctr, Anim & Plant Hlth Agcy, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Population control; Wild boar density; Camera traps; Social organization; Wildlife management; SUS-SCROFA L; HUNTING DISTURBANCE; FAMILY GROUPS; LOWER SAXONY; DRIVE HUNTS; CROP DAMAGE; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; PREDATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148721
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wild boar growth in numbers and range is associated with increasing economic and environmental impact. Hunting has been traditionally used to reduce wild boar numbers. Areas where hunting is not allowed may attract wild boar from neighbouring hunting grounds. This phenomenon is called 'reserve effect' and could cause temporarily localised, high densities of wild boar in areas where hunting is banned. To investigate the occurrence of 'reserve effect', this study was conducted in two natural reserves of 400 and 250 ha inside the Montseny Natural Park, Catalonia, Spain where regular hunting of wild boar is not permitted, and only sporadic driven hunts/year are authorised for population control. The aims of the study were to evaluate if wild boar use these reserves as a refuge when hunting is carried out in the surrounding areas and to assess the effects that occasional drive hunts inside these reserves may have on wild boar numbers and social organization. From 2012 to 2015 camera traps were placed in the two reserves without using any bait. Cameras operated for 1.759 days, including hunting and non hunting seasons, and 37.574 wild boar images were obtained. A 'reserve effect' was detected, as following hunting in the surroundings grounds, the number of wild boar increases inside reserves. Occasional driven hunts conducted in the reserves are effective in reducing the number of individuals and the effects persist for at least 45 days. Hunting disrupts wild boar social organization, as group size was significantly reduced. These results suggested that targeting refuge areas, once hunting in the surroundings causes wild boar to concentrate in these areas, is effective for population control. These findings could also be used to design trategies to optimise population control and offer opportunities for disease management such as vaccination, or to facilitate eradication in areas affected by disease outbreaks. Crown Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the "refuge effect" [J].
Amici, Andrea ;
Serrani, Fioravante ;
Rossi, Carlo Maria ;
Primi, Riccardo .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 32 (03) :683-692
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J MT ECOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, MEAS MAITR BRUC CHEZ
[4]   Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review [J].
Barrios-Garcia, M. Noelia ;
Ballari, Sebastian A. .
BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2012, 14 (11) :2283-2300
[5]  
Baubet E., 1998, Gibier Faune Sauvage, V15, P655
[6]   Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial [J].
Bernal, James Lopez ;
Cummins, Steven ;
Gasparrini, Antonio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) :348-355
[7]   Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa:: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers [J].
Bieber, C ;
Ruf, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2005, 42 (06) :1203-1213
[8]   Wild boar impact on forest regeneration in the northern Apennines (Italy) [J].
Bongi, Paolo ;
Tomaselli, Marcello ;
Petraglia, Alessandro ;
Tintori, Davide ;
Carbognani, Michele .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 391 :230-238
[9]   Tools in waterfowl reserve management: effects of intermittent hunting adjacent to a shooting-free core area [J].
Bregnballe, T ;
Madsen, J .
WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2004, 10 (04) :261-268
[10]   Protected areas as refuges for pest species? The case of wild boar [J].
Brogi, R. ;
Grignolio, S. ;
Brivio, F. ;
Apollonio, M. .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22