Prioritising transport barriers and enablers to mobility in later life: A case study from Greater Manchester in the United Kingdom

被引:13
作者
Musselwhite, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Ctr Innovat Ageing, Coll Human & Hlth Sci, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
关键词
Ageing; Public transport; Mobility; Community transport; Walking; Transport policy; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jth.2021.101085
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: There are many barriers to mobility for older people which are detrimental to older people's health and wellbeing. This research got older people to prioritise their transport barriers in terms of their importance as a barrier to getting out and about, and the likelihood that that barrier occurs locally to them. Following this, older people then co-developed and prioritised solutions to the barriers, prioritising them in terms of potential effectiveness and perceived ease of implementation. Methodology: Using a case study of Greater Manchester in the United Kingdom, a series of focus groups in different locations got older people and stakeholders to prioritise issues and solutions for older people's mobility around neighbourhood, public and community transport and policy and practice themes. Results: Participants tended to prioritise issues that affected their safety. Poor quality pavements, sharing pavements with cyclists and mobility scooters, poor crossing facilities and bus drivers driving off before they had a chance to sit down were all major issues and all related to the potential for falls. Poor information and signage was another issue with public and community transport. To help put things right, it was strongly suggested transport staff need age friendly awareness training. Participants also wanted more involvement with decision making over transport and the built environment with a need to move beyond the current forms of consultation. Conclusion: Overall, there was a constant tension between older people portraying themselves and being seen as frail and needy and as resourceful, proactive and engaged. This makes the transport offering difficult to achieve, schemes aimed at plugging deficits are seen as inappropriately patronising, yet schemes not aimed at older people can make them feel misunderstood or ignored.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   Developing A Model of Mobility Capital for An Ageing Population [J].
Musselwhite, Charles ;
Scott, Theresa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (18)
[32]   Older people's travel and mobility needs: a reflection of a hierarchical model 10 years on [J].
Musselwhite, Charles ;
Haddad, Hebba .
QUALITY IN AGEING AND OLDER ADULTS, 2018, 19 (02) :87-105
[33]   Further examinations of mobility in later life and improving health and wellbeing [J].
Musselwhite, Charles .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2015, 2 (02) :99-100
[34]   The role of transport and mobility in the health of older people [J].
Musselwhite, Charles ;
Holland, Carol ;
Walker, Ian .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2015, 2 (01) :1-4
[35]   Mobility, accessibility and quality of later life [J].
Musselwhite, Charles ;
Haddad, Hebba .
QUALITY IN AGEING AND OLDER ADULTS, 2010, 11 (01) :25-37
[36]   Examining the process of driving cessation in later life [J].
Musselwhite, Charles B. A. ;
Shergold, Ian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2013, 10 (02) :89-100
[37]  
Newton R., 2008, IDGO INCLUSIVE DESIG
[38]  
Newton R.A, 2012, IDGO INCLUSIVE DESIG
[39]  
NICE, 2013, Walking and cycling: Local measures to promote walking and cycling as forms of travel or recreation NICE public health guidance 41
[40]  
ONS, 2019, ANN MID YEAR POP EST