Feasibility of sending a direct send HPV self-sampling kit to long-term non-attenders in an organized cervical screening program

被引:4
|
作者
Sahlgren, Hanna [1 ,2 ]
Sparen, Par [1 ]
Elfgren, Kristina [3 ]
Elfstrom, K. Miriam [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Reg Canc Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Dept Clin Sci Intervent, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Lab Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Karolinska Univ Lab, Ctr Cerv Canc Prevent, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
HPV; HPV self sampling; Cervical cancer; Cervical cancer screening; WOMEN; PARTICIPATION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.430
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Non-participation in screening is a main risk factor for cervical cancer. Human-papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling may be an alternative to repeated invitations for non-attenders. Several studies have concluded that participation among non-attenders increases significantly when offering self-sampling kits for HPV. However, participation rates are highly variable between settings, and therefore pilots to determine optimal implementation strategy have been recommended before routine roll out. Materials and Methods: All women who had not participated in the organized screening program for at least 10 years aged 33-62 in one Swedish county were identified through screening registers. HPV self-sampling kits were sent to all eligible women. Participation was defined as returning a self-sample kit or attending routine screening within 6 months. Women who did not submit the kit within 8 weeks were randomized to receive a written reminder. HPV-positive women were referred directly to colposcopy without prior triage. Biopsies for histopathologic confirmation were used as gold standard. Results: Among eligible women, 150/741 (20.2%) returned the self-sample kit or attended routine screening. A randomized written reminder was sent out to 319/591 non-responders and another 11 women returned the kit. In total, 23/147 (16.3%) of returned kits were HPV positive. Out of the 23 HPV-positive women, 17 (74%) attended colposcopy; 10/17 (59%) had a histopathological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or cervical cancer. The most common HPV type was HPV 52, and 2 out of 3 women with HPV 16 had a histopathologically confirmed cancer. Conclusion: The direct send kit strategy and referral of all HPV-positive women to colposcopy without prior triage appears to be feasible if resources are available and should be prioritized given the high prevalence of HSIL lesions and cancer among non-attenders. A written reminder might further increase attendance. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Operational experiences from the general implementation of HPV self-sampling to Danish screening non-attenders
    Ejegod, Ditte Moller
    Pedersen, Helle
    Pedersen, Birgitte Tonnes
    Serizawa, Reza
    Bonde, Jesper
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 160
  • [2] Human papillomavirus self-sampling for long-term non-attenders in cervical cancer screening: A randomised feasibility study in Estonia
    Veerus, Piret
    Hallik, Reeli
    Janes, Jaak
    Joers, Kai
    Paapsi, Keiu
    Laidra, Kaia
    Innos, Kaire
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2022, 29 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [3] HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
    Aasbo, Gunvor
    Trope, Ameli
    Nygard, Mari
    Christiansen, Irene Kraus
    Baasland, Ingrid
    Iversen, Grete Alrek
    Munk, Ane Cecilie
    Christiansen, Marit Halonen
    Presthus, Gro Kummeneje
    Undem, Karina
    Bjorge, Tone
    Castle, Philip E.
    Hansen, Bo T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 127 (10) : 1816 - 1826
  • [4] HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening - a randomised controlled trial
    Szarewski, A.
    Cadman, L.
    Mesher, D.
    Austin, J.
    Ashdown-Barr, L.
    Edwards, R.
    Lyons, D.
    Walker, J.
    Christison, J.
    Frater, A.
    Waller, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 104 (06) : 915 - 920
  • [5] Addressing COVID-19 Screening Delays: The Impact of HPV Self-Sampling on Non-Attenders in a Cervical Cancer Screening Program
    Chiereghin, Angela
    Pizzi, Lorenzo
    Buriani, Carolina
    Sanna, Tiziana
    Amico, Andrea
    Squillace, Lorena
    Molinari, Elena
    Florean, Maria Siponta
    Lanza, Giovanni
    Mezzetti, Francesca
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [6] The cost-effectiveness of opt-in and send-to-all HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: The Equalscreen randomized controlled trial
    Knauss, Tara
    Hansen, Bo T.
    Pedersen, Kine
    Aasbo, Gunvor
    Kunst, Natalia
    Burger, Emily A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 168 : 39 - 47
  • [7] HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening – a randomised controlled trial
    A Szarewski
    L Cadman
    D Mesher
    J Austin
    L Ashdown-Barr
    R Edwards
    D Lyons
    J Walker
    J Christison
    A Frater
    J Waller
    British Journal of Cancer, 2011, 104 : 915 - 920
  • [8] Acceptance of Self-Sampling Among Long-Term Cervical Screening Non-Attenders with HPV-Positive Results: Promising Opportunity for Specific Cancer Education
    Andersson, Sonia
    Belkic, Karen
    Mints, Miriam
    Ostensson, Ellinor
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2021, 36 (01) : 126 - 133
  • [9] Offering self-sampling to cervical screening non-attenders in primary care
    Lim, Anita W. W.
    Hollingworth, Antony
    Kalwij, Sebastian
    Curran, Geoffrey
    Sasieni, Peter
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2017, 24 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [10] Randomised trial of HPV self-sampling among non-attenders in the Slovenian cervical screening programme ZORA: comparing three different screening approaches
    Ivanus, Urska
    Jerman, Tine
    Fokter, Alenka Repse
    Takac, Iztok
    Prevodnik, Veronika Kloboves
    Marcec, Mateja
    Gajsek, Ursula Salobir
    Pakiz, Maja
    Koren, Jakob
    Celik, Simona Hutter
    Kramberger, Kristina Gornik
    Klopcic, Ulrika
    Kavalar, Rajko
    Zatler, Simona Sramek
    Kuzmanov, Biljana Grcar
    Florjancic, Mojca
    Nolde, Natasa
    Novakovic, Srdjan
    Poljak, Mario
    Zakelj, Maja Primic
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) : 399 - 412