Sound reduction management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants

被引:57
|
作者
Almadhoob, Abdulraoof [1 ]
Ohlsson, Arne [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Salmaniya Med Complex, Manama, Bahrain
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Gynaecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
*Ear Protective Devices; *Intensive Care Units; Neonatal; *Stress; Physiological; Employee Performance Appraisal; Health Personnel; Infant; Premature; *growth; development; Very Low Birth Weight [*growth & development; Noise [adverse effects] [*prevention & control; Parents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sound [adverse effects; Humans; Newborn; NOISE-LEVELS; EXPOSURE; NEWBORNS; IMPACT; NIDCAP; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD010333.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are subjected to stress, including sound of high intensity. The sound environment in the NICU is louder than most home or office environments and contains disturbing noises of short duration and at irregular intervals. There are competing auditory signals that frequently challenge preterm infants, staff and parents. The sound levels in NICUs often exceed the maximum acceptable level of 45 decibels (dB), recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Hearing impairment is diagnosed in 2% to 10% of preterm infants versus 0.1% of the general paediatric population. Noise may cause apnoea, hypoxaemia, alternation in oxygen saturation, and increased oxygen consumption secondary to elevated heart and respiratory rates and may, therefore, decrease the amount of calories available for growth. Elevated levels of speech are needed to overcome the noisy environment in the NICU, thereby increasing the negative impacts on staff, newborns, and their families. High noise levels are associated with an increased rate of errors and accidents, leading to decreased performance among staff. The aim of interventions included in this review is to reduce sound levels to 45 dB or less. This can be achieved by lowering the sound levels in an entire unit, treating the infant in a section of a NICU, in a 'private' room, or in incubators in which the sound levels are controlled, or reducing the sound levels that reaches the individual infant by using earmuffs or earplugs. By lowering the sound levels that reach the neonate, the resulting stress on the cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and endocrine systems can be diminished, thereby promoting growth and reducing adverse neonatal outcomes. Objectives Primary objective To determine the effects of sound reduction on growth and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonates. Secondary objectives 1. To evaluate the effects of sound reduction on short-term medical outcomes (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity). 2. To evaluate the effects of sound reduction on sleep patterns at three months of age. 3. To evaluate the effects of sound reduction on staff performance. 4. To evaluate the effects of sound reduction in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on parents' satisfaction with the care. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, abstracts from scientific meetings, clinical trials registries (clinicaltrials.gov ; controlled-trials.com ; and who.int/ictrp), Pediatric Academic Societies Annual meetings 2000 to 2014 (Abstracts2View (TM)), reference lists of identified trials, and reviews to November 2014. Selection criteria Preterm infants (< 32 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) or < 1500 g birth weight) cared for in the resuscitation area, during transport, or once admitted to a NICU or a stepdown unit. Data collection and analysis We performed data collection and analyses according to the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Main results One small, high quality study assessing the effects of silicone earplugs versus no earplugs qualified for inclusion. The original inclusion criteria in our protocol stipulated an age of < 48 hours at the time of initiating sound reduction. We made a deviation from our protocol and included this study in which some infants would have been > 48 hours old. There was no significant difference in weight at 34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA): mean difference (M D) 111 g (95% confidence interval (CI) -151 to 374 g) (n = 23). There was no significant difference in weight at 18 to 22 months corrected age between the groups: MD 0.31 kg, 95% CI -1.53 to 2.16 kg (n = 14). There was a significant difference in Mental Developmental Index (Bayley II) favouring the silicone earplugs group at 18 to 22 months corrected age: MD 14.00, 95% CI 3.13 to 24.87 (n = 12), but not for Psychomotor Development Index (Bayley II) at 18 to 22 months corrected age: MD -2.16, 95% CI -18.44 to 14.12 (n =12). Authors' conclusions To date, only 34 infants have been enrolled in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness of reducing sound levels that reach the infants' ears in the NICU. Based on the small sample size of this single trial, we cannot make any recommendations for clinical practice. Larger, well designed, conducted and reported trials are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Use of Premedication for Intubating Very Low Birth Weight Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Results of a National Survey
    DeMartino, Cassandra
    Neches, Sara
    Gray, Megan M.
    Sawyer, Taylor
    Johnston, Lindsay
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2025,
  • [32] Comparison of mortality and morbidity in multiple versus singleton very low birth weight infants in a neonatal intensive care unit
    Lee, KH
    Hwang, SJ
    Kim, SH
    Lee, SH
    Yu, DK
    Hwang, JH
    Choi, CW
    Shim, JW
    Chang, YS
    Park, WS
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 18 (06) : 779 - 782
  • [33] Estimation of the causal effect of sex on neonatal intensive care unit outcomes among very low birth weight infants
    Hagan, Joseph L.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 44 (06) : 844 - 850
  • [34] Cost Savings of Mother’s Own Milk for Very Low Birth Weight Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Tricia J. Johnson
    Aloka L. Patel
    Michael E. Schoeny
    Paula P. Meier
    PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2022, 6 : 451 - 460
  • [35] Immunization of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with Prevnar™:: Is it ok?
    Sumner, JL
    Goodman, B
    Bush, MA
    Badhwar, P
    Sanchez, PJ
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 311A - 311A
  • [36] Risk factors of acute kidney injury in very low birth weight infants in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit
    Moraes, Lucas Hirano Arruda
    Krebs, Vera Lucia Jornada
    Koch, Vera Hermina Kalika
    Magalhaes, Natalia Assis Medeiros
    de Carvalho, Werther Brunow
    JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2023, 99 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [37] Fathers' Visitation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit during the First Week of Life
    Patel, Khushbu
    Cortright, Lindsay
    Tumin, Dmitry
    Kohler, John A., Sr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (09) : 909 - 913
  • [38] Spontaneous gastrointestinal perforation in very-low-birth-weight infants - a rare complication in a neonatal intensive care unit
    Resch, B
    Mayr, J
    Kuttnig-Haim, M
    Reiterer, F
    Ritschl, E
    Muller, W
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 13 (2-3) : 165 - 167
  • [39] Pilot study of experiences and needs of 111 fathers of very low birth weight infants in a neonatal intensive care unit
    Garten, L.
    Nazary, L.
    Metze, B.
    Buehrer, C.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 33 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [40] Prophylactic fluconazole in very low birth weight infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unit: randomized controlled trial
    Kirpal, Harita
    Gathwala, Geeta
    Chaudhary, Uma
    Sharma, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (04): : 624 - 628