Design optimization and trade-off study of WFXT optics

被引：0

作者：

Conconi, Paolo ^{[1
]}

Pareschi, Giovanni ^{[1
]}

Campana, Sergio ^{[1
]}

Citterio, Oberto ^{[1
]}

Civitani, Marta ^{[1
]}

Cotroneo, Vincenzo ^{[1
]}

Proserpio, Laura ^{[1
]}

Tagliaferri, Gianpiero ^{[1
]}

Parodi, Giancarlo ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] INAF Osservatorio Astron Brera, Via Bianchi 46, I-23807 Merate, LC, Italy

[2] BCV Progetti, I-20123 Milan, Italy

来源：

OPTICS FOR EUV, X-RAY, AND GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY IV | 2009年 / 7437卷

关键词：

Missions; X-ray astronomical instrumentation; X-ray telescopes; wide-field X-ray optics; X-ray astronomical surveys;

D O I：

10.1117/12.827468

中图分类号：

P1 [天文学];

学科分类号：

0704 ;

摘要：

X-ray mirrors are usually built in the Wolter I (paraboloid-hyperboloid) configuration which provides, in principle, perfect on-axis images. This design exhibits no spherical aberration on-axis but suffers from field curvature, coma and astigmatism, therefore the angular resolution degrades rapidly with increasing off-axis angles. Different mirror designs exist in which the primary and secondary mirror profiles are expanded as a power series in order to increase the angular resolution at large off-axis positions. Here we present the design and global trade off study of an X-ray mirror systems based on polynomial optics in view of the Wide Field X-ray Telescope (WFXT) mission. WFXT aims at performing an extended cosmological survey in the soft X-ray band with unprecedented flux sensitivity. To achieve these goals the angular resolution required for the mission is very demanding, of 5 arcsec HEW resolution goal to be achieved across a 1-deg field of view, in addition an effective area of 5-9000 cm(2) at 1 keV is needed.

引用

页数：10

共 50 条

[31] TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS USING PARAMETRIC OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES
NAKAYAMA, H
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 60 (01) : 87 - 98
[32] TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS BASED UPON PARAMETRIC OPTIMIZATION
NAKAYAMA, H
LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS, 1991, 356 : 42 - 52
[33] An internet graph model based on trade-off optimization
Alvarez-Hamelin, JI
Schabanel, N
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2004, 38 (02): : 231 - 237
[34] On generalized trade-off directions in nonconvex multiobjective optimization
Kaisa Miettinen
Marko M. Mäkelä
Mathematical Programming, 2002, 92 : 141 - 151
[35] An internet graph model based on trade-off optimization
J. I. Alvarez-Hamelin
N. Schabanel
The European Physical Journal B, 2004, 38 : 231 - 237
[36] MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION BY THE SURROGATE WORTH TRADE-OFF METHOD
SAKAWA, M
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1978, 27 (05) : 311 - 314
[37] Free trade trade-off
Freedman, M
FORBES, 2002, 169 (06): : 44 - 44
[38] Trade-off and Optimization of Supply Chain Carbon Management
Wang Yunqi
ENTERPRISE GROWS IN SUSTAINING EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS: 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES, 2010, : 221 - 226
[39] Modeling and Optimization Trade-off in Meta-learning
Gao, Katelyn
Sener, Ozan
ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 33, NEURIPS 2020, 2020, 33
[40] Multichip systems design trade-off analysis tool
Sandborn, Peter A.
Ghosh, Rajarshi
Drake, Ken
Abadir, Magdy
Bal, Linda
Parikh, Ashish
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications (JETTA), 1994, 5 (2-3): : 207 - 218

← 1 2 3 4 5 →