SICO: Surgical Interception Attacks by Manipulating BGP Communities

被引:23
作者
Birge-Lee, Henry [1 ]
Wang, Liang [1 ]
Rexford, Jennifer [1 ]
Mittal, Prateek [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ACM SIGSAC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (CCS'19) | 2019年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
networking; security; BGP; hijacking attacks; interception attacks; BGP communities;
D O I
10.1145/3319535.3363197
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the primary routing protocol for the Internet backbone, yet it lacks adequate security mechanisms. While simple BGP hijack attacks only involve an adversary hijacking Internet traffic destined to a victim, more complex and challenging interception attacks require that adversary intercept a victim's traffic and forward it on to the victim. If an interception attack is launched incorrectly, the adversary's attack will disrupt its route to the victim making it impossible to forward packets. To overcome these challenges, we introduce SICO attacks (Surgical Interception using COmmunities): a novel method of launching interception attacks that leverages BGP communities to scope an adversary's attack and ensure a route to the victim. We then show how SICO attacks can be targeted to specific source IP addresses for reducing attack costs. Furthermore, we ethically perform SICO attacks on the real Internet backbone to evaluate their feasibility and effectiveness. Results suggest that SICO attacks can achieve interception even when previously proposed attacks would not be feasible and outperforms them by attracting traffic from an additional 16% of Internet hosts (worst case) and 58% of Internet hosts (best case). Finally, we analyze the Internet topology to find that at least 83% of multi-homed ASes are capable of launching these attacks.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 448
页数:18
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, 9 ROUTE SERVERS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, OBJECT NAME AS5511 O
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, INTERNET EXCHANGE DI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, OBJECT NAME AS1299 T
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2019, OBJECT NAME AS3491 P
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, 9 ROUTE SERVERS AMS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2019, GTT BGP COMMUNITIES
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, REPORT RPKI INVALID
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2019, OPERATIONAL BGP COMM
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2019, AS286 ROUTING POLICY