Comparison between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in complex patient and lesions subsets

被引:6
|
作者
Roy, Probal
Torguson, Rebecca
Okabe, Teruo
Slottow, Tina L. Pinto
Steinberg, Daniel H.
Smith, Kimberly
Xue, Zhenyi
Gevorkian, Natalie
Satler, Lowell L.
Kent, Kenneth M.
Suddath, William O.
Pichard, Augusto D.
Waksman, Ron
机构
[1] Washington Hosp Ctr, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Washington Hosp Ctr, Div Cardiol, Washington, DC 20010 USA
关键词
sirolimus-eluting stents; paclitaxel-eluting stents; complex subsets;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.21122
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) both significantly reduce the need for repeat intervention compared to bare metal stents. Studies comparing the clinical outcomes of these stents in noncomplex subsets of patients and lesions demonstrate a similar safety and efficacy profile. The data for more complex subsets of patients and lesions remains conflicting. This study aimed to compare SES with PES in a selected population with a broad range of complex features. Methods and Results: The patient population consisted of 1,591 consecutive patients with complex features undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. In the SES group there were 1,095 patients (1,653 lesions) and in the PES group 496 patients (802 lesions). In-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month clinical outcomes were compared between groups. No discernable difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between SES and PES was detected at intermediate and longer-term follow-up (SES 22.4% vs. PES 20.5% at 12 months; P = 0.407). A trend toward increased angiographically documented stent thrombosis was observed in the SES group at both 3 and 12 months (SES 2.2% vs. PES 0.8% at 12 months; P = 0.051). When adopting the more inclusive definition of probable stent thrombosis, this trend was no longer seen. After adjusting for baseline differences between the two groups, there still remained no difference in MACE between SES and PES (HR 1.051 [CI 0.826-1.339] P = 0.685). The trend toward increased angiographically documented stent thrombosis in the SES group remained after adjustment for baseline differences (HR 2.836 [CI 0.968-8.311] P = 0.057). Conclusions: In a selected population with complex disease the rate of MACE was comparable between SES and PES, with higher overall rates of thrombosis and MACE compared to a noncomplex population. Thus, the focus should be directed to prevent late complications in this complex subset regardless of stent type selection. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 172
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
    Lee, Michael S.
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Xhaxho, Jola
    Yang, Tae
    Ehdaie, Ashkan
    Bhatia, Ravi
    Favaretto, Enrico
    Tobis, Jonathan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (04) : 378 - 382
  • [22] Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents versus Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery disease
    Choi, Hyung Oh
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Kim, Won-Jang
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Kim, Jae-Joong
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Park, Seung-Jung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (6A): : 159D - 159D
  • [23] Comparison of outcomes of full metal jacket with sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for de novo coronary artery lesions
    Mishra, S
    Kuchulakanti, P
    Chu, WW
    Wolfram, RM
    Xue, Z
    Donekal, S
    Pichard, A
    Satler, L
    Kent, K
    Waksman, R
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (17) : U747 - U747
  • [24] Comparison of Inflammatory Response After Implantation of Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Porcine Coronary Arteries
    Wilson, Gregory J.
    Nakazawa, Gaku
    Schwartz, Robert S.
    Huibregtse, Barbara
    Poff, Bradley
    Herbst, Thomas J.
    Baim, Donald S.
    Virmani, Renu
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (02) : 141 - U75
  • [25] Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery
    Doggrell, SA
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 5 (06) : 1431 - 1434
  • [26] Angiographic analysis of pattern of late luminal loss in sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents
    Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
    Cosgrave, John
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L.
    Sangiorgi, Giuseppe M.
    Ge, Lei
    Melzi, Gloria
    Corbett, Simon
    Airoldi, Flavio
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Michev, Iassen
    Carlino, Mauro
    Colombo, Antonio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (05): : 593 - 598
  • [27] Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Unselected Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
    Park, Seung-Jung
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 77 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [28] Intravascular Ultrasound Findings of Stent Fractures in Patients With Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents
    Doi, Hiroshi
    Maehara, Akiko
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Tsujita, Kenichi
    Kubo, Takashi
    Castellanos, Celia
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    Witzenbichler, Bernhard
    Guagliumi, Giulio
    Brodie, Bruce
    Kellett, Mine A., Jr.
    Parise, Helen
    Mehran, Roxana
    Leon, Martin B.
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (07): : 952 - 957
  • [29] Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary implantation of sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents
    Kastrati, A
    Dibra, A
    Mehilli, J
    Mayer, S
    Pinieck, S
    Pache, J
    Dirschinger, J
    Schöming, A
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 113 (19) : 2293 - 2300
  • [30] ABT-578-eluting stents - The promising successor of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent concepts?
    Buellesfeld, L
    Grube, E
    HERZ, 2004, 29 (02) : 167 - 170