Does regional loss of bone density explain low trauma distal forearm fractures in men (the Mr F study)?

被引:11
|
作者
Hanusch, B. C. [1 ]
Tuck, S. P. [1 ,2 ]
McNally, R. J. Q. [3 ]
Wu, J. J. [4 ,5 ]
Prediger, M. [2 ]
Walker, J. [1 ]
Tang, J. [6 ]
Piec, I. [6 ]
Fraser, W. D. [6 ]
Datta, H. K. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, R. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ Hosp, Marton Rd, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Inst Cellular Med, Musculoskeletal Res Grp, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Royal Victoria Infirm, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Durham, Biophys Sci Inst, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[5] Univ Durham, Sch Engn & Comp Sci, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[6] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Bioanalyt Facil, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Bone density; DXA; Forearmfracture; Male; Osteoporosis; SYMPTOMATIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; COLLES FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; MINERAL DENSITY; RADIUS FRACTURE; RISK-FACTORS; ELDERLY-MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-017-4122-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The pathogenesis of low trauma wrist fractures in men is not fully understood. This study found that these men have lower bone mineral density at the forearm itself, as well as the hip and spine, and has shown that forearm bone mineral density is the best predictor of wrist fracture. Introduction Men with distal forearm fractures have reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and hip sites, an increased risk of osteoporosis and a higher incidence of further fractures. The aim of this case-control study was to investigate whether or not there is a regional loss of bone mineral density (BMD) at the forearm between men with and without distal forearm fractures. Methods Sixty-one men with low trauma distal forearm fracture and 59 age-matched bone healthy control subjects were recruited. All subjects underwent a DXA scan of forearm, hip and spine, biochemical investigations, health questionnaires, SF-36v2 and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). The non-fractured arm was investigated in subjects with fracture and both forearms in control subjects. Results BMD was significantly lower at the ultradistal forearm in men with fracture compared to control subjects, in both the dominant (mean (SD) 0.386 g/cm(2) (0.049) versus 0.436 g/cm(2) (0.054), p < 0.001) and non-dominant arm (mean (SD) 0.387 g/cm(2) (0.060) versus 0.432 g/cm(2) (0.061), p = 0.001). Fracture subjects also had a significantly lower BMD at hip and spine sites compared with control subjects. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictor of forearm fracture was ultradistal forearm BMD (OR = 0.871 (0.805-0.943), p = 0.001), with the likelihood of fracture decreasing by 12.9% for every 0.01 g/cm(2) increase in ultradistal forearm BMD. Conclusions Men with low trauma distal forearm fracture have significantly lower regional BMD at the ultradistal forearm, which contributes to an increased forearm fracture risk. They also have generalised reduction in BMD, so that low trauma forearm fractures in men should be considered as indicator fractures for osteoporosis.
引用
收藏
页码:2877 / 2886
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Does regional loss of bone density explain low trauma distal forearm fractures in men (the Mr F study)?
    B. C. Hanusch
    S. P. Tuck
    R. J. Q. McNally
    J. J. Wu
    M. Prediger
    J. Walker
    J. Tang
    I. Piec
    W. D. Fraser
    H. K. Datta
    R. M. Francis
    Osteoporosis International, 2017, 28 : 2877 - 2886
  • [2] Bone turnover markers as determinants of bone density and fracture in men with distal forearm fractures: the pathogenesis examined in the Mr F study
    Hanusch, B.
    Prediger, M.
    Tuck, S. P.
    Walker, J.
    McNally, R.
    Datta, H. K.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 32 (11) : 2267 - 2277
  • [3] Bone turnover markers as determinants of bone density and fracture in men with distal forearm fractures: the pathogenesis examined in the Mr F study
    B. Hanusch
    M. Prediger
    S.P. Tuck
    J. Walker
    R. McNally
    H.K. Datta
    Osteoporosis International, 2021, 32 : 2267 - 2277
  • [4] Reduced trabecular bone mineral density and thinner cortices in men with distal forearm fractures
    Tuck, Stephen P.
    Hanusch, Birgit
    Prediger, Michael
    Walker, Julie A.
    McNally, Richard
    Datta, Harish K.
    BONE, 2022, 164
  • [5] Low calcaneal bone mineral density and the risk of distal forearm fracture in women and men: A population-based case-control study
    Atroshi, Isam
    Ahlander, Fredrik
    Billsten, Mats
    Ahlborg, Henrik G.
    Mellstrom, Dan
    Ohlsson, Claes
    Ljunggren, Osten
    Karlsson, Magnus K.
    BONE, 2009, 45 (04) : 789 - 793
  • [6] Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization
    Cho, Sung Tan
    Kim, Jin Hwan
    Lee, Sung San
    Lee, Yong Jae
    Lee, Hyun Il
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [7] Prevalence of low forearm bone mineral density in Bulgarian men: a pilot study
    Boyanov, Mihail A.
    Popivanov, Plamen R.
    Temelkova, Natalya L.
    AGING MALE, 2007, 10 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [8] Deficits in distal radius bone strength, density and microstructure are associated with forearm fractures in girls: an HR-pQCT study
    Maeaettae, M.
    Macdonald, H. M.
    Mulpuri, K.
    McKay, H. A.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 (03) : 1163 - 1174
  • [9] More Rapid Bone Mineral Density Loss in Older Men With Diabetes: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study
    Tramontana, Flavia
    Napoli, Nicola
    Litwack-Harrison, Stephanie
    Bauer, Douglas C.
    Orwoll, Eric S.
    Cauley, Jane A.
    Strotmeyer, Elsa S.
    Schwartz, Ann, V
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2024, 109 (12) : e2283 - e2290
  • [10] More-than-minimal-trauma fractures are associated with low bone density: an 8-year prospective study
    Pereira, L.
    Bliuc, D.
    Stanford, P.
    Eisman, J. A.
    Center, J. R.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (01) : 103 - 110