Beneficial effects of ERCP and papillotomy in predicted severe biliary pancreatitis

Background/Aims: Extensive circumstantial evidence indicates that patients with a predicted severe attack of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) should undergo an endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with papillotomy (ERC/PT). However, in clinical practice this procedure is not always performed. This study was conducted to compare outcome in patients with and without ERC/PT. Methodology: Thirty-five of 80 patients admitted with ABP had a predicted severe attack (three or more, Ranson criteria). Only in 24 of these 35 patients was an ERC/PT performed. Results: In the ERC/PT group, significantly less pancreatic necrosis (8 vs. 64%, p<0.001) occurred, hospital stay was shorter (median 22 +/- 5 vs. 51 +/- 19 days, P=0.08) and mortality was lower (8 vs. 36%, P=0.01). Twenty-three patients (66%) underwent cholecystectomy after a median period of 10 weeks (range 0-26 weeks) after discharge. During the waiting period, in the ERC/PT group, two patients developed acute cholecystitis whereas recurrent ABP and common bile duct stones occurred in one patient each. Conclusions: In patients with a predicted severe attack of ABP, performing ERC/PT is associated with less morbidity and lower mortality.