Using Neural Networks and Diversifying Differential Evolution for Dynamic Optimisation

被引:0
作者
Shorch, Maryam Hasani [1 ]
Aragonds, Renato Hermoza [2 ]
Neumann, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Optimisat & Logist, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Australian Inst Machine Learning, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI) | 2020年
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic constrained optimisation; differential evolution; neural network;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Dynamic optimisation occurs in a variety of real-world problems. To tackle these problems, evolutionary algorithms have been extensively used due to their effectiveness and minimum design effort. However, for dynamic problems, extra mechanisms arc required on top of standard evolutionary algorithms. Among them, diversity mechanisms have proven to be competitive in handling dynamism, and recently, the use of neural networks have become popular for this purpose. Considering the complexity of using neural networks in the process compared to simple diversity mechanisms, we investigate whether they are competitive and the possibility of integrating them to improve the results. However, for a fair comparison, we need to consider the same time budget for each algorithm. Thus instead of the usual number of fitness evaluations as the measure for the available time between changes, we use wall clock timing. The results show the significance of the improvement when integrating the neural network and diversity mechanisms depends to the type and the frequency of changes. Moreover, we observe that for differential evolution, having a proper diversity in population when using neural network plays a key role in the neural network's ability to improve the results.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Constraint Handling Techniques for Dynamic Constrained Optimization Problems
    Ameca-Alducin, Maria-Yaneli
    Hasani-Shoreh, Maryam
    Blaikie, Wilson
    Neumann, Frank
    Mezura-Montes, Efren
    [J]. 2018 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2018, : 290 - 297
  • [2] Ameca-Alducin MY, 2014, 2014 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), P975, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2014.6900629
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium 2006
  • [4] Branke J, 2000, EVOLUTIONARY DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE, P299
  • [5] Branke J., 2003, NAT COMP SER, P239
  • [6] Bui LT, 2005, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P2349
  • [7] Cobb HelenG., 1990, INVESTIGATION USE HY
  • [8] An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms
    Deb, K
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 186 (2-4) : 311 - 338
  • [9] A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms
    Derrac, Joaquin
    Garcia, Salvador
    Molina, Daniel
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 1 (01) : 3 - 18
  • [10] A Competitive-Cooperative Coevolutionary Paradigm for Dynamic Multiobjective Optimization
    Goh, Chi-Keong
    Tan, Kay Chen
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2009, 13 (01) : 103 - 127