Safe drilling angles avoid femoral tunnel complications during combined anterolateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:8
|
作者
Jette, Cristian [1 ]
Pomes, Jaume [2 ]
Sastre, Sergi [1 ]
Gutierrez, David [1 ]
Llusa, Manuel [1 ,3 ]
Combalia, Andres [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, 170 Villarroel St, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Radiol, Div Musculoskeletal Radiol, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Med Sch, Dept Human Anat, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Anterolateral ligament; Femoral tunnel drilling; ACL reconstruction; Anatomic reconstruction; CORNER; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-019-05388-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To determine the best angle to drill the femoral tunnels of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) anatomic reconstruction combined with a single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to avoid tunnel collisions and cortical disruption. Methods Ten cadaveric knees were studied. Single-bundle anatomic ACL femoral tunnels were arthroscopically drilled. The starting point of the ALL femoral tunnel was located posterior and superior to the lateral epicondyle. ALL tunnels were drilled at four different angulations: (1) 0 degrees axial/0 degrees coronal, (2) 0 degrees axial/30 degrees coronal superior, (3) 30 degrees axial anterior/0 degrees coronal, and (4) 30 degrees axial anterior 30 degrees coronal superior. Specimens were scanned by computed tomography to measure the relations of each trajectory with the ACL socket and the nearest cortical bone. Results None of the four trajectories studied presented risk of collision with the ACL. The tunnel at 30 degrees anterior/30 degrees proximal presented the safest distance to the ACL socket (P = 0.01) [mean distance 18.6 mm (SD +/- 6.7)]. However, both tunnels angled at 0 degrees in the axial plane presented a high risk of posterior femoral cortex disruption (P = 0.01), either by close proximity or direct contact in some specimens (mean distance 3.1 mm (SD +/- 2.8) at 0 degrees axial/0 degrees coronal and 3.7 mm (SD +/- 2.2) at 0 degrees axial/30 degrees coronal). Conclusions When performing simultaneous ACL and ALL ligament reconstruction, the ALL femoral tunnel should be drilled with an angle of 30 degrees anterior in the axial plane and 30 degrees proximal in the coronal plane. Tunnels with an angle of 0 degrees in the axial plane showed high risk of contact and disruption of the posterior femoral cortex; thus, these angles should be avoided. The clinical relevance of this work is that an ALL anatomical reconstruction does not represent a risk when performing a simultaneous ACL reconstruction as long as the ALL tunnel is reamed with a proximal and anterior angulation.
引用
收藏
页码:3411 / 3417
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safe drilling angles avoid femoral tunnel complications during combined anterolateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Cristian Jette
    Jaume Pomés
    Sergi Sastre
    David Gutierrez
    Manuel Llusa
    Andrés Combalia
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2019, 27 : 3411 - 3417
  • [2] High risk of tunnel convergence during combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction
    Smeets, Kristof
    Bellemans, J.
    Lamers, G.
    Valgaeren, B.
    Bruckers, L.
    Gielen, E.
    Vandevenne, J.
    Vandenabeele, F.
    Truijen, J.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (02) : 611 - 617
  • [3] High risk of tunnel convergence during combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction
    Kristof Smeets
    J. Bellemans
    G. Lamers
    B. Valgaeren
    L. Bruckers
    E. Gielen
    J. Vandevenne
    F. Vandenabeele
    J. Truijen
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2019, 27 : 611 - 617
  • [4] Combined Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Hopper, Graeme P.
    Philippe, Corentin
    El Helou, Abdo
    Gousopoulos, Lampros
    Fradin, Thomas
    Vieira, Thais Dutra
    Saithna, Adnan
    Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2022, 11 (07): : E1269 - E1275
  • [5] A Comparison of 2 Drilling Techniques on the Femoral Tunnel for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Miller, Chealon D.
    Gerdeman, Andrew C.
    Hart, Joseph M.
    Bennett, Chase G.
    Golish, S. Raymond
    Gaskin, Christopher
    Miller, Mark D.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (03) : 372 - 379
  • [6] Comparison of 4 Femoral Tunnel Drilling Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Larson, Andrew I.
    Bullock, Daniel P.
    Pevny, Tomas
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (07) : 972 - 979
  • [7] Does combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction improve return to sport?
    Gonnachon, Arnaud
    Labattut, Ludovic
    Abdoul Carime, Nafiz
    Orta, Cyril
    Baulot, Emmanuel
    Martz, Pierre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 981 - 987
  • [8] An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 2 Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Nitri, Marco
    Rasmussen, Matthew T.
    Williams, Brady T.
    Moulton, Samuel G.
    Cruz, Raphael Serra
    Dornan, Grant J.
    Goldsmith, Mary T.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (03) : 593 - 601
  • [9] Clinical Outcomes After Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Delaloye, Jean-Romain
    Murar, Jozef
    Gonzalez, Mauricio
    Amaral, Thiago
    Kakatkar, Vikram
    Sonnery-Cotte, Bertrand
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 33 (04) : 225 - 231
  • [10] Biomechanical Comparison of Anterolateral Procedures Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Inderhaug, Eivind
    Stephen, Joanna M.
    Williams, Andy
    Amis, Andrew A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (02) : 347 - 354