Effect of monovalent ions in glass ionomer on their uptake and re-release

被引:24
作者
Hadley, PC [1 ]
Billington, RW [1 ]
Pearson, GJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Eastman Dent Inst, London WC1X 8LD, England
关键词
glass ionomer; fluoride; sodium; dental materials; ion exchange;
D O I
10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00246-4
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Aims: The study aims to directly measure uptake of Na and F ions by glass ionomer cement from dilute NaF solution and compare this with the subsequent re-release of these ions into water. In addition, the effect of the presence or absence of Na and/or F as a component of the glass is evaluated. Materials and methods: The four glass ionomers used differed only in glass composition; AH2 contained both Na and F, LG26 contained F, MP4 contained Na and LG30 contained neither Na nor F. Discs of cement were set in moulds at 37 degrees C for 1 h and matured in water at 37 degrees C for 3 days. Test discs were immersed in 0.2% NaF solution for 24 h, control discs in water. Discs were subsequently immersed in water which was changed regularly. Ion-selective electrode measurements (F and Na) and atomic absorption spectrometry (Na) were used to determine uptake (change in immersion solution concentration) and re-release into water. Results: All cements took up large quantities of Na and F ions (range 95-336 mu mol g(-1)). This resulted in internal ion concentrations from 16 to 56 times higher than the immersing solution. All re-release was complete within 97 days. No cement re-released more ion than taken up. Glass ionomers containing fluoride took up more Na and F than fluoride-free ones and then re-released a lower percentage of these ions. The cements all took up Na and F ions in equimolar proportions, but initially re-released more F than Na with F-free cement results tending to unity by 97 days. Conclusions: Glass ionomer cements take up Na and F ions from NaF solution in large quantities and in equimolar proportion. This is re-released either wholly or in part in 97 days by which time the release does not differ from the controls. The presence or absence of F in the cement composition markedly influences both uptake and re-release. Fluoride/hydroxyl interchange does not appear to play an important role in uptake. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 897
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] BILLINGTON RW, 1987, J DENT RES, V66, P844
  • [2] BILLINGTON RW, 1992, T 4 WORLD BIOM C, P213
  • [3] FORSTEN L, 1991, SCAND J DENT RES, V99, P241
  • [4] HATIBOVICKOFMAN S, 1991, SWED DENT J, V15, P253
  • [5] JAMES R, 1991, J DENT RES, V70, P9
  • [6] FLUORIDE-ION DIFFUSION FROM POLYALKENOATE (GLASS-IONOMER) CEMENTS
    TAY, WM
    BRADEN, M
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 1988, 9 (05) : 454 - 456
  • [7] Method for enhancing the fluoride release of a glass-ionomer cement
    Thevadass, KP
    Pearson, GJ
    Anstice, HM
    Davies, EH
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 1996, 17 (04) : 425 - 429
  • [8] GLASS POLYALKENOATE (GLASS-IONOMER) CEMENTS - A REVIEW
    WALLS, AWG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1986, 14 (06) : 231 - 246
  • [9] Comparison of ion release from a glass ionomer cement as a function of the method of incorporation of added ions
    Williams, JA
    Billington, RW
    Pearson, GJ
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 1999, 20 (06) : 589 - 594