Can we routinely measure patient involvement in treatment decision-making in chronic kidney care? A service evaluation in 27 renal units in the UK

被引:20
|
作者
Durand, Marie-Anne [1 ,2 ]
Bekker, Hilary L. [3 ]
Casula, Anna [4 ]
Elias, Robert [5 ]
Ferraro, Alastair [6 ]
Lloyd, Amy [7 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [8 ]
Metcalfe, Wendy [9 ]
Mooney, Andrew [10 ]
Thomson, Richard G. [11 ]
Tomson, Charles R. V. [12 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Univ Hertfordshire, Dept Psychol, Hatfield, Herts, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] UK Renal Registry, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Kings Coll Hosp London, Denmark Hill, London, England
[6] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Nottingham, England
[7] Cardiff Univ, Cochrane Inst Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[8] Univ Hosp Ghent, European Renal Best Practice ERBP Methods Support, Ghent, Belgium
[9] Scottish Renal Registry, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[10] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[11] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[12] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL | 2016年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
chronic kidney disease; doctor-patient communication; implementation; routine measure; shared decision-making; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/ckj/sfw003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Shared decision making is considered an important aspect of chronic disease management. We explored the feasibility of routinely measuring kidney patients' involvement in making decisions about renal replacement therapy (RRT) in National Health Service settings. Methods: We disseminated a 17-item paper questionnaire on involvement in decision-making among adult patients with established kidney failure who made a decision about RRT in the previous 90 days (Phase 1) and patients who had been receiving RRT for 90-180 days (Phase 2). Recruitment rates were calculated as the ratio between the number of included and expected eligible patients (I : E ratio). We assessed our sample's representativeness by comparing demographics between participants and incident patients in the UK Renal Registry. Results: Three hundred and five (Phase 1) and 187 (Phase 2) patients were included. For Phase 1, the I : E ratio was 0.44 (range, 0.08-2.80) compared with 0.27 (range, 0.04-1.05) in Phase 2. Study participants were more likely to be white compared with incident RRT patients (88 versus 77%; P < 0.0001). We found no difference in age, gender or social deprivation. In Phases 1 and 2, the majority reported a collaborative decision-making style (73 and 69%), and had no decisional conflict (85 and 76%); the median score for shared decision-making experience was 12.5 (Phase 1) and 10 (Phase 2) out of 20. Conclusion: Our study shows the importance of assessing the feasibility of data collection in a chronic disease context prior to implementation in routine practice. Routine measurement of patient involvement in established kidney disease treatment decisions is feasible, but there are challenges in selecting the measure needed to capture experience of involvement, reducing variation in response rate by service and identifying when to capture experience in a service managing people's chronic disease over time.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Shared decision-making for renal replacement treatment and illness perception in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
    Hsiao, Shih-Ming
    Kuo, Mei-Chuan
    Hsiao, Pei-Ni
    Moi, Sin-Hua
    Chiu, Yi-Wen
    Wang, Shu-Li
    Chen, Tzu-Hui
    Kung, Lan-Fang
    Hwang, Shang-Jyh
    Lee, Chia-Lun
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Shared decision-making for renal replacement treatment and illness perception in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
    Shih-Ming Hsiao
    Mei-Chuan Kuo
    Pei-Ni Hsiao
    Sin-Hua Moi
    Yi-Wen Chiu
    Shu-Li Wang
    Tzu-Hui Chen
    Lan-Fang Kung
    Shang-Jyh Hwang
    Chia-Lun Lee
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [3] Patient-Reported Outcome Dashboards Within the Electronic Health Record to Support Shared Decision-making: Protocol for Co-design and Clinical Evaluation With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease
    Perry, Laura M.
    Morken, Victoria
    Peipert, John D.
    Yanez, Betina
    Garcia, Sofia F.
    Barnard, Cynthia
    Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
    Linder, Jeffrey A.
    Jordan, Neil
    Ackermann, Ronald T.
    Harris, Alexandra
    Kircher, Sheetal
    Mohindra, Nisha
    Aggarwal, Vikram
    Frazier, Rebecca
    Coughlin, Ava
    Bedjeti, Katy
    Weitzel, Melissa
    Nelson, Eugene C.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Van Citters, Aricca D.
    O'Connor, Mary
    Cella, David
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [4] Translation and Psychometric Evaluation in Cancer Care of the German Version of collaboRATE™-a 3-item Patient-reported Measure of Shared Decision-Making
    Hahlweg, Pola
    Zeh, Stefan
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Zill, Joerdis
    Dirmaier, Joerg
    Barr, Paul James
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Haerter, Martin
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2025, 28 (02)
  • [5] Shared decision making after severe stroke-How can we improve patient and family involvement in treatment decisions?
    Visvanathan, Akila
    Dennis, Martin
    Mead, Gillian
    Whiteley, William N.
    Lawton, Julia
    Doubal, Fergus Neil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2017, 12 (09) : 920 - 922
  • [6] Metrics of Patient, Public, Consumer, and Community Engagement in Healthcare Systems: How Should We Define Engagement, What Are We Measuring, and Does It Matter for Patient Care? Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review"
    Berger, Zackary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 8 (01): : 49 - 50