Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: Theoretical invariance and practical application

被引:125
作者
Barnett, Lionel [1 ]
Seth, Anil K.
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sackler Ctr Consciousness Sci, Brighton BN1 9QJ, E Sussex, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Granger causality; Digital filtering; Vector autoregressive modelling; Time series analysis; TIME-SERIES; INFORMATION-TRANSFER; LINEAR-DEPENDENCE; CONNECTIVITY; MODEL; FMRI; FACTORIZATION; VARIABILITY; FEEDBACK; TOOLBOX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Granger causality (G-causality) is increasingly employed as a method for identifying directed functional connectivity in neural time series data. However, little attention has been paid to the influence of common preprocessing methods such as filtering on G-causality inference. Filtering is often used to remove artifacts from data and/or to isolate frequency bands of interest. Here, we show [following Geweke (1982)] that G-causality for a stationary vector autoregressive (VAR) process is fully invariant under the application of an arbitrary invertible filter; therefore filtering cannot and does not isolate frequency-specific G-causal inferences. We describe and illustrate a simple alternative: integration of frequency domain (spectral) G-causality over the appropriate frequencies ("band limited G-causality"). We then show, using an analytically solvable minimal model, that in practice G-causality inferences often do change after filtering, as a consequence of large increases in empirical model order induced by filtering. Finally, we demonstrate a valid application of filtering in removing a nonstationary ("line noise") component from data. In summary, when applied carefully, filtering can be a useful preprocessing step for removing artifacts and for furnishing or improving stationarity; however filtering is inappropriate for isolating causal influences within specific frequency bands. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 419
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Permutation tests for linear models
    Anderson, MJ
    Robinson, J
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2001, 43 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [2] Antoniou A., 1993, Digital Filters : Analysis, Design, and Applications
  • [3] Partial directed coherence:: a new concept in neural structure determination
    Baccalá, LA
    Sameshima, K
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2001, 84 (06) : 463 - 474
  • [4] Granger Causality and Transfer Entropy Are Equivalent for Gaussian Variables
    Barnett, Lionel
    Barrett, Adam B.
    Seth, Anil K.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2009, 103 (23)
  • [5] Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance
    Barrett, Adam B.
    Barnett, Lionel
    Seth, Anil K.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 81 (04):
  • [6] Wiener-Granger Causality: A well established methodology
    Bressler, Steven L.
    Seth, Anil K.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 58 (02) : 323 - 329
  • [7] BSMART: A MATLAB/C toolbox for analysis of multichannel neural time series
    Cui, Jie
    Xu, Lei
    Bressler, Steven L.
    Ding, Mingzhou
    Liang, Hualou
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2008, 21 (08) : 1094 - 1104
  • [8] Identifying Neural Drivers with Functional MRI: An Electrophysiological Validation
    David, Olivier
    Guillemain, Isabelle
    Saillet, Sandrine
    Reyt, Sebastien
    Deransart, Colin
    Segebarth, Christoph
    Depaulis, Antoine
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (12) : 2683 - 2697
  • [9] Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI
    Deshpande, Gopikrishna
    Sathian, K.
    Hu, Xiaoping
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 52 (03) : 884 - 896
  • [10] Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality
    Dhamala, Mukeshwar
    Rangarajan, Govindan
    Ding, Mingzhou
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 41 (02) : 354 - 362