Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: Theoretical invariance and practical application

被引:128
作者
Barnett, Lionel [1 ]
Seth, Anil K.
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sackler Ctr Consciousness Sci, Brighton BN1 9QJ, E Sussex, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Granger causality; Digital filtering; Vector autoregressive modelling; Time series analysis; TIME-SERIES; INFORMATION-TRANSFER; LINEAR-DEPENDENCE; CONNECTIVITY; MODEL; FMRI; FACTORIZATION; VARIABILITY; FEEDBACK; TOOLBOX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Granger causality (G-causality) is increasingly employed as a method for identifying directed functional connectivity in neural time series data. However, little attention has been paid to the influence of common preprocessing methods such as filtering on G-causality inference. Filtering is often used to remove artifacts from data and/or to isolate frequency bands of interest. Here, we show [following Geweke (1982)] that G-causality for a stationary vector autoregressive (VAR) process is fully invariant under the application of an arbitrary invertible filter; therefore filtering cannot and does not isolate frequency-specific G-causal inferences. We describe and illustrate a simple alternative: integration of frequency domain (spectral) G-causality over the appropriate frequencies ("band limited G-causality"). We then show, using an analytically solvable minimal model, that in practice G-causality inferences often do change after filtering, as a consequence of large increases in empirical model order induced by filtering. Finally, we demonstrate a valid application of filtering in removing a nonstationary ("line noise") component from data. In summary, when applied carefully, filtering can be a useful preprocessing step for removing artifacts and for furnishing or improving stationarity; however filtering is inappropriate for isolating causal influences within specific frequency bands. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 419
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Permutation tests for linear models [J].
Anderson, MJ ;
Robinson, J .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2001, 43 (01) :75-88
[2]  
Antoniou A., 1993, Digital Filters : Analysis, Design, and Applications
[3]   Partial directed coherence:: a new concept in neural structure determination [J].
Baccalá, LA ;
Sameshima, K .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2001, 84 (06) :463-474
[4]   Granger Causality and Transfer Entropy Are Equivalent for Gaussian Variables [J].
Barnett, Lionel ;
Barrett, Adam B. ;
Seth, Anil K. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2009, 103 (23)
[5]   Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance [J].
Barrett, Adam B. ;
Barnett, Lionel ;
Seth, Anil K. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 81 (04)
[6]   Wiener-Granger Causality: A well established methodology [J].
Bressler, Steven L. ;
Seth, Anil K. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 58 (02) :323-329
[7]   BSMART: A MATLAB/C toolbox for analysis of multichannel neural time series [J].
Cui, Jie ;
Xu, Lei ;
Bressler, Steven L. ;
Ding, Mingzhou ;
Liang, Hualou .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2008, 21 (08) :1094-1104
[8]   Identifying Neural Drivers with Functional MRI: An Electrophysiological Validation [J].
David, Olivier ;
Guillemain, Isabelle ;
Saillet, Sandrine ;
Reyt, Sebastien ;
Deransart, Colin ;
Segebarth, Christoph ;
Depaulis, Antoine .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (12) :2683-2697
[9]   Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI [J].
Deshpande, Gopikrishna ;
Sathian, K. ;
Hu, Xiaoping .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 52 (03) :884-896
[10]   Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality [J].
Dhamala, Mukeshwar ;
Rangarajan, Govindan ;
Ding, Mingzhou .
NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 41 (02) :354-362